Call us today0800 160 1298
 
 

Litigation Protection

The potential costs involved in resolving a commercial dispute vary greatly depending on whether a claim is successful or unsuccessful. If an action is successful, the costs involved will often be mitigated by a financial award. However, if an action is unsuccessful, the losing party may be ordered to pay the costs of those involved in the action.

Yet the risk and costs of losing a commercial claim needn't prevent an individual or a business from pursuing a claim that has a strong chance of success. There are many insurance products now available that can reduce, or remove, the costs of failing to win a commercial claim.

These products, which come under the broad term of 'After the Event' (ATE) insurance, offer a creative and bespoke method of protecting against the financial risks and liabilities involved in losing litigation.

After the Event Commercial Legal Expenses Insurance

'After the Event' (ATE) insurance provides extra protection against the risks involved in resolving a dispute through the courts. It covers the potential losses and costs incurred if a legal claim is unsuccessful. This means that many common commercial claims, whether they relate to recovering debt, professional negligence, commercial property, insolvency or breach of contract, can be brought without any of the initial costs.

Litigation insurance products such as ATE will often cover an opponent's costs if the claim fails, as well as those of the person pursuing legal action. This kind of insurance is therefore very valuable for any individual or business that wants the peace of mind that they will not be liable for an opponent's costs should their claim fail.

ATE insurance also has the added benefit that the premium is only payable when the case is over and the claim was successful. This is because the premium is expected to be paid from any settlement or damages that are awarded in the insured's favour.

The level of the premium payable on success will often depend on the type of cover sought and the risks involved in bringing a claim. It may be a percentage of the insured amount or of the costs incurred at the end of the case. It is possible to negotiate the terms and premium payable to reflect the particular circumstances of the claim.

Although the fees of an insured person's solicitor are not covered by ATE insurance, it can be possible to offset a solicitor's fees by entering into a no win, no fee or no win, low fee agreement. By doing so, someone who wishes to bring a claim will be safe in the knowledge that they will only have to pay the costs of a commercial claim if they are successful.

Litigation Insurance Experts

Advantage Litigation Services can help you find and apply for the right insurance product in a straightforward and efficient way. We can also help you obtain additional cover should you need it, or apply for cover to be backdated.

Contact our litigation insurance product specialists for a no-obligation assessment of your potential claim and the funding options that are available. Click here to contact us today or call 01252 354434 to see how we can help.

Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • Pink Floyd legend and multi-instrumentalist David Gilmour has become embroiled in a contract dispute with the composer of a well-known and popular jingle that can be heard at train stations throughout France. The jingle, originally composed by Frenchman Michael Boumendil, is used by French national railway company SNCF throughout its 20,000 mile network. Gilmour, who joined Pink Floyd in 1967, first heard the jingle when travelling across France in 2013. In an interview with Le Parisien in 2015, he claimed that the up-baet 2-second piece made him “..want to sing and dance”. Gilmour subsequently contacted sonic branding specialist Boumendil, asking if he could use the jingle in a separate song. Alledged breach of contract Once Boumendil realised that the request was genuine and that he wasn’t being pranked, an agreement was reached between them and SNCF in 2015 and Boumendil received a co-writing... Read More

  • A recent costs hearing at the High Court in London has revealed the extent of the legal costs already accumulated in the high-profile Bates v Post Office litigation action. The class action claim, backed by litigation funders Therium Capital, involves over 500 former subpostmasters and mistresses who are claiming that the Post Office, following the implementation of a new IT system called ‘Horizon’, incorrectly blamed them for apparent shortfalls in branch accounts. The hearing disclosed that costs on both sides have now topped £35m, prompting Mr Justice Fraser to comment that some costs incurred seemed ‘excessive’. The barristers representing the claimants, Henderson Chambers, argued that the Post Office has spent more than the 555 claimants, citing a figure of £19.5m compared with £16.828m. They also pointed out that the Post Office has employed two law firms and as a result is instructing... Read More

  • Multiple European champions and current Premier League frontrunners Liverpool FC have emerged victorious in a recent contract dispute and are now free to use global sportswear giant Nike as their new supplier of official team kit. Liverpool has been provided with team and club kit by manufacturer New Balance since 2012. The recent judgment ends a dispute that had culminated in a 3 day hearing as New Balance attempted to maintain their lucrative contract with the club. The Boston-based manufacturer were extremely keen to retain their relationship with a club which, as well as being one of soccer’s most recognised brands on a global scale, is also currently performing well on the pitch. When it became clear that the club were interested in a new kit contract with Nike, New Balance tried force the activation of a renewal clause in their contract... Read More