Call us today0800 160 1298
 
 

Advantage Litigation

Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

Want to avoid future legal problems? – use well-written contracts

Posted by on in Uncategorized
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 244
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

Business at all levels is underpinned by contracts. These can range from simple verbal agreements for low value transactions through to complex and detailed written agreements between corporations and governments. To save on the risk of future avoidable legal claims, writing a contract that is suitable for the transaction or agreement is key.

A contract is a pledge, between two or more parties (be they individuals or organisations), that is legally binding. It is designed to the fulfilment of commitment in exchange for something of value. Whilst some contracts may be made verbally, there are some that must be in writing, such as for a property transaction.

Contracts – why are they important?

A contract is designed to make sure that ensure that your position and interests are protected by law and that both parties understand that there is a clear and written record that they need to fulfil their obligations in the agreement. If any party to a contract is in breach of the contract's conditions, then there are usually a number of solutions – or ‘remedies’ – outlined to resolve such breaches.
A well written contract that is appropriate for your needs is very important. Should a disagreement between parties occur, which can happen if the contract terms are unclear or not relevant, then ultimately it will be a court of law that will decide.  

The 4 main parts of a contract

For a contract to be valid, it must have four key parts: agreement, capacity, consideration, and intention.

Agreement

Offer
An agreement happens when an offer is made by 1 party to the other, and that offer is accepted. An offer is a statement of terms which the person making the offer is prepared to be contractually bound to. An offer is different from an invitation to treat which only invites someone to make an offer, and is not intended to be contractually binding. For example, advertisements, catalogues and brochures where prices of a product are listed are not offers but invitations to treat. If they were, then the advertiser would have to provide everyone who 'accepted' them with the product regardless of stock levels.

Acceptance
Acceptance of the offer must be unconditional (eg via a signature) and it must be communicated. Any negotiations between the parties are counter-offers, not acceptance. Doing nothing is not generally considered acceptance, unless it is clear that acceptance was intended (eg by way of conduct, like paying for a product). What constitutes as adequate acceptance will vary depending on the type of contract.

Capacity

All parties must have the ability to understand the terms of and any obligations under the contract. Also, consent to the contract must be freely given (eg there cannot be any coercion/force, fraud, undue influence, or misrepresentation). Types of people who generally lack the capacity to enter into contracts include:

• children under 18 - unless the contract is for necessities (food and clothing) or education (an apprenticeship or employment contract) and the terms are fair and benefit the child
• people suffering from mental health conditions or under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol - only if the condition affects the person's ability to understand the nature of the transaction or if the other party is aware of their incapacity
If a person lacking capacity has entered into a contract, it will generally be up to that person to decide if they want to invalidate the contract.

Consideration

Parties must exchange some value for a contract to be binding. This is called consideration. Consideration does not have to be adequate or for the benefit of the other person, it merely has to be sufficient (eg if someone offers to sell their house for nothing, there is no consideration; but if they offer to sell it for £1, then there is valid consideration). Examples of insufficient consideration include:

• an existing public duty (eg a police officer's duty to protect the public) or contractual duty (eg the production of services already required by another contract)
• something with sentimental value only
• something that occurred before the contract - consideration must move from the contract (eg a gift received in January cannot be consideration for a contract entered into in October)
• anything illegal

Intention

Not all agreements between parties are contracts. It must be clear that the parties intended to enter into a legally binding contract. In the case of business agreements, the general assumption is that the parties intended to enter into a contract.
In social situations, there is generally no intention for agreements to become legally binding contracts (eg friends deciding to meet at a specific time would not constitute a valid contract). It is up to the person who wants the agreement to be a contract to prove that the parties actually intended to enter into a legally binding contract.

Litigation Funding for Contract Disputes

If you are thinking about taking legal action against another individual or company but are worried about the costs involved, Advantage Litigation Services have the skills and expertise to help you find a way of funding commercial litigation without risking your personal finances or those of your business. Click here to contact us today or call 0800 160 1298 to see how we can help.

 

Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • Pink Floyd legend and multi-instrumentalist David Gilmour has become embroiled in a contract dispute with the composer of a well-known and popular jingle that can be heard at train stations throughout France. The jingle, originally composed by Frenchman Michael Boumendil, is used by French national railway company SNCF throughout its 20,000 mile network. Gilmour, who joined Pink Floyd in 1967, first heard the jingle when travelling across France in 2013. In an interview with Le Parisien in 2015, he claimed that the up-baet 2-second piece made him “..want to sing and dance”. Gilmour subsequently contacted sonic branding specialist Boumendil, asking if he could use the jingle in a separate song. Alledged breach of contract Once Boumendil realised that the request was genuine and that he wasn’t being pranked, an agreement was reached between them and SNCF in 2015 and Boumendil received a co-writing... Read More

  • A recent costs hearing at the High Court in London has revealed the extent of the legal costs already accumulated in the high-profile Bates v Post Office litigation action. The class action claim, backed by litigation funders Therium Capital, involves over 500 former subpostmasters and mistresses who are claiming that the Post Office, following the implementation of a new IT system called ‘Horizon’, incorrectly blamed them for apparent shortfalls in branch accounts. The hearing disclosed that costs on both sides have now topped £35m, prompting Mr Justice Fraser to comment that some costs incurred seemed ‘excessive’. The barristers representing the claimants, Henderson Chambers, argued that the Post Office has spent more than the 555 claimants, citing a figure of £19.5m compared with £16.828m. They also pointed out that the Post Office has employed two law firms and as a result is instructing... Read More

  • Multiple European champions and current Premier League frontrunners Liverpool FC have emerged victorious in a recent contract dispute and are now free to use global sportswear giant Nike as their new supplier of official team kit. Liverpool has been provided with team and club kit by manufacturer New Balance since 2012. The recent judgment ends a dispute that had culminated in a 3 day hearing as New Balance attempted to maintain their lucrative contract with the club. The Boston-based manufacturer were extremely keen to retain their relationship with a club which, as well as being one of soccer’s most recognised brands on a global scale, is also currently performing well on the pitch. When it became clear that the club were interested in a new kit contract with Nike, New Balance tried force the activation of a renewal clause in their contract... Read More