Call us today0800 160 1298
 
 

Advantage Litigation

Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

US Tech Giant faces Shareholder Class Action Claim

Posted by on in Uncategorized
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 948
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

US based IT services and consultancy business DXC technology is facing another class action claim following allegations that the company, which employs over 130,000 people in multiple global locations, has used its strategic redundancy programme to simply boost profits whilst leaving them unable to properly service their clients.

The class action lawsuit is being made on behalf of DXC shareholders and was lodged at the US District Court in California in September this year by well-known New York based class action litigators Brager, Eagel & Squire. The shareholders are disputing DXC’s 2017 investor prospectus in which the tech giant, formed in 2017 after a merger between CSC and a division of HP, claimed that the new company would see be able to realise $1bn of ‘synergies’ in its first 12 months due to increased economies of scale, increased administration efficiency and changes in the global workforce. This included a statement that DXC would ensure that they retain “highly motivated people with the skills necessary to serve their customers.”

The Brager, Eagel & Squire law suit alleges:

The Offering Materials' representations, financial metrics and purported risk disclosures were false and misleading because they failed to disclose that Defendants' planned "workforce optimisation" plan was, in truth, earnings management in disguise. Defendants would impose arbitrary quotas that resulted in the termination of tens of thousands of workers, selectively timed to artificially inflate reported earnings over the short term and present misleadingly inflated quarterly and yearly financial reports to boost the stock price, ahead of insider sales, including by Defendant Lawrie, who exercised stock options to gain millions in personal profit.”

At the time the claim was lodged, DXC shares were trading at $31, significantly lower than the $59 price at the time of the firms creation via merger. It is considered likely that additional shareholders may look to piggyback the lawsuit, subject to everything going to plan of course. Whilst class action claims of this type are fairly common in the US, wether they are successful or not depends on a wide range of factors.

Shareholder Dispute and Commercial Litigation Funding

If you are thinking about taking legal action against another company but are worried about the costs involved, Advantage Litigation Services have the skills and expertise to help you find a way of funding commercial litigation without risking your personal finances or those of your business. Click here to contact us today or call 0800 160 1298 to see how we can help.

Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • Following recent Supreme Court rulings in two professional negligence cases, the Court has outlined a “wholly new legal roadmap” for professional negligence claims made in England and Wales. As a result, the Professional Negligence Lawyers Association (PNLA) have said that existing claims will now need to be reviewed, stating that “for many there could be a substantial impact on the likely chances of success and the assessment of financial loss”.The cases in question are Khan v Meadows [2021] and Manchester Building Society v Grant Thornton UK LLP [2021]. The first case centred on whether a medical expert, who failed to diagnose that a mother carried the haemophilia gene, was liable for the costs associated with her son’s autism as well as his haemophilia, whilst the second case concerned whether accountants Grant Thornton were liable for the costs of a building society... Read More

  • A recently failed business claim that was dismissed at court has once again highlighted the many pitfalls and legal complexities facing litigants in person (LIPs – that is, individuals taking legal action without professional representation from a solicitor or barrister). The claim in question - Daly & Anr v Ryan & Anr. 2021 - concerned an individual businessman who had a costly judgment entered against him simply because he had repeatedly failed to abide by the rules. Read More

  • Latest statistics from the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), who are responsible for the regulation of solicitors and law firms in England and Wales, confirm what many in the profession have been predicting for a while; that law firms are accelerating the consolidation process as they begin to embrace new ways of working. Read More