Call us today0800 160 1298
 
 

Advantage Litigation

Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

US Tech Giant faces Shareholder Class Action Claim

Posted by on in Uncategorized
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 365
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

US based IT services and consultancy business DXC technology is facing another class action claim following allegations that the company, which employs over 130,000 people in multiple global locations, has used its strategic redundancy programme to simply boost profits whilst leaving them unable to properly service their clients.

The class action lawsuit is being made on behalf of DXC shareholders and was lodged at the US District Court in California in September this year by well-known New York based class action litigators Brager, Eagel & Squire. The shareholders are disputing DXC’s 2017 investor prospectus in which the tech giant, formed in 2017 after a merger between CSC and a division of HP, claimed that the new company would see be able to realise $1bn of ‘synergies’ in its first 12 months due to increased economies of scale, increased administration efficiency and changes in the global workforce. This included a statement that DXC would ensure that they retain “highly motivated people with the skills necessary to serve their customers.”

The Brager, Eagel & Squire law suit alleges:

The Offering Materials' representations, financial metrics and purported risk disclosures were false and misleading because they failed to disclose that Defendants' planned "workforce optimisation" plan was, in truth, earnings management in disguise. Defendants would impose arbitrary quotas that resulted in the termination of tens of thousands of workers, selectively timed to artificially inflate reported earnings over the short term and present misleadingly inflated quarterly and yearly financial reports to boost the stock price, ahead of insider sales, including by Defendant Lawrie, who exercised stock options to gain millions in personal profit.”

At the time the claim was lodged, DXC shares were trading at $31, significantly lower than the $59 price at the time of the firms creation via merger. It is considered likely that additional shareholders may look to piggyback the lawsuit, subject to everything going to plan of course. Whilst class action claims of this type are fairly common in the US, wether they are successful or not depends on a wide range of factors.

Shareholder Dispute and Commercial Litigation Funding

If you are thinking about taking legal action against another company but are worried about the costs involved, Advantage Litigation Services have the skills and expertise to help you find a way of funding commercial litigation without risking your personal finances or those of your business. Click here to contact us today or call 0800 160 1298 to see how we can help.

Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • A recent independent report by London-based litigation analytics specialists Solomonic has highlighted a fall in the number of litigation actions taking place in the UK’s commercial courts, following steady growth in the preceding five previous years. The commercial courts had fast become the court of choice for litigants from Europe and farther afield, but the dual impacts of undecided post-Brexit legislation and the more recent Coronavirus Covid-19 pandemic has seen litigants seek alternative jurisdictions. The Solomonics report indicates that between April 2019 and March 2020, 198 cases were heard in London’s commercial courts, a 9% decline compared to the previous year. Litigants from EU countries formed 13.6% of all litigants, down from 16.5% two years ago. In contrast, statistics compiled by litigation consultants Portland show that the number of litigants from Singapore and Kazakhstan has risen almost 200% since 2018/19. UK... Read More

  • Global tech giant Apple is likely to face a group-action claim over multiple problems and failures of the displays on its popular MacBook Pro range. Apple, one of the ‘big 5’ global technology companies and the first US company to be valued at over $1 trillion, is the defendant in a complaint filed in a California district court that alleges a number of breaches of state and federal consumer protection laws, in addition to fraudulent concealment. Lead claimant Mahan Taleshpour is suing Apple on behalf of American consumers who have purchased a MacBook Pro from the model years of 2016 to date. Taleshpour claims that Apple was aware of - and decided to cover up - a design defect in the connection cable between the MacBook Pro's base and display. It is alleged that this manufacturing defect results in the cable... Read More

  • The ongoing coronavirus Covid-19 crisis continues to impact on UK civil litigation hearings with a recent High Court decision meaning that the largest ever class action claim can proceed remotely. Whilst such remote hearings may be seen as a means to an end during the current lockdown conditions, once such hearings become the ‘new normal’, the impact on how civil litigation claims are conducted is likely to be huge. Read More