Advantage Litigation
Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.
The Brexit effect – looming problems with patent and intellectual property law
- Font size: Larger Smaller
- Hits: 1363
- Subscribe to this entry
- Bookmark
The Brexit effect – looming problems with patent and intellectual property law
German intellectual property lawyer Ingve Stjerna has succeeded in a court action which effectively puts the European patent regime on hold, having described the UK’s desire to remain a member of the new system – the Unified Patent Court (UPC) - as ‘astonishing’.
Dr Stjerna bought the case before Germany’s federal constitutional court, who recently confirmed an extension to the original deadline for accepting comments on the case. As Germany, along with the UK and France, must ratify such an agreement before it is enshrined in law, the deadline extension means that there is now no chance of the agreement being enforced in 2017.
Dr Stjerna commented:
At the very least, an explanation is needed why in case of the UPC the creation of new obligations from union law and respective powers for the CJEU as well as a respective liability of the UK for union law violations are deemed acceptable, despite the envisaged objectives for leaving the EU”
Set against the background of the ongoing Brexit negation’s between the UK Government and the EU, the new UPC has already been affected with delays. Under the current planned implementation, the UPC intends to locate one of its three major divisions in London.
If you need legal assistance with a patent or intellectual property dispute, see how Advantage could help – click here to contact us or call on 0800 160 1298
Latest News
-
New Tests are Coming for Professional Negligence Claims
Following recent Supreme Court rulings in two professional negligence cases, the Court has outlined a “wholly new legal roadmap” for professional negligence claims made in England and Wales. As a result, the Professional Negligence Lawyers Association (PNLA) have said that existing claims will now need to be reviewed, stating that “for many there could be a substantial impact on the likely chances of success and the assessment of financial loss”.The cases in question are Khan v Meadows [2021] and Manchester Building Society v Grant Thornton UK LLP [2021]. The first case centred on whether a medical expert, who failed to diagnose that a mother carried the haemophilia gene, was liable for the costs associated with her son’s autism as well as his haemophilia, whilst the second case concerned whether accountants Grant Thornton were liable for the costs of a building society... Read More
-
Failed Business Claims Highlights Risks of Not Having Professional Representation
A recently failed business claim that was dismissed at court has once again highlighted the many pitfalls and legal complexities facing litigants in person (LIPs – that is, individuals taking legal action without professional representation from a solicitor or barrister). The claim in question - Daly & Anr v Ryan & Anr. 2021 - concerned an individual businessman who had a costly judgment entered against him simply because he had repeatedly failed to abide by the rules. Read More
-
Law Firms look to New Ways of Working as Numbers Shrink
Latest statistics from the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), who are responsible for the regulation of solicitors and law firms in England and Wales, confirm what many in the profession have been predicting for a while; that law firms are accelerating the consolidation process as they begin to embrace new ways of working. Read More
