Call us today0800 160 1298
 
 

Advantage Litigation

Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

Professional Negligence Claims and Compensation Levels

Posted by on in Uncategorized
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 702
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

When a solicitor begins the process of preparing a civil litigation claim for professional negligence, one of the most common questions their Client will ask is ‘how much compensation should I expect’? Whilst the short answer could be ‘how long is a piece of string’ (which is not very helpful, of course!), once the nature of the claim and the amount of financial loss suffered as a result of the negligence has been established, it should be fairly straightforward to establish the amount that can be claimed for.

Calculating Your Professional Negligence Compensation

The main metric used when calculating the likely level of compensation that you may be entitled to is based on the total, accumulated financial loss that has resulted from the actions of the negligent party. As an example, say you were using the services of a law firm to pursue a business claim against a supplier and your solicitor missed a time limit deadline, resulting in your claim being struck out; this would clearly be negligent on behalf of the law firm, and the compensation from the subsequent professional negligence claim amount would be based both on the value of the failed claim plus the related legal costs incurred.

However, not all cases may be quite so straightforward. For example, the law in England states that compensation cannot be claimed for loss that is deemed to be too 'remote' from the error or not 'reasonably foreseeable'. The principles of 'remoteness' and 'reasonable foreseeability' can often result in added complexity, and it will be difficult for someone who is not properly trained to appreciate the ins and outs that they will bring. Central to disputes of compensation levels in professional negligence claims is the “SAAMCO” principle, named after a 1996 case which said that:

A person under a duty to take reasonable care to provide information on which someone else will decide upon a course of action is, if negligent, not generally regarded as responsible for all the consequences of that course of action. He is responsible only for the consequences of the information being wrong."

The facts in the SAAMCO case were relatively simple. A valuer negligently overvalued a property that the bank was going to use as security. SAAMCO claimed the negative equity on the property that had occurred as a result of a market crash. The logic of their argument was that if the valuer had not over-valued the property in the first place, SAAMCO would not have invested in the property so that when the market crashed it wouldn’t have made even greater losses. The courts disagreed, stating that there was a difference between “advice” and “information”. In this instance, the valuer had merely given information on the value of the property; what SAAMCO then did with it was up to them and the valuer could not be held responsible for the consequences of the information being wrong.

So, as you can see, the devil is very much in the detail and it isn’t easy to immediately appreciate the nuances of the judgment, especially as there wasn’t much guidance given about the differences between “advice” and “information”. In fact, whether something is or is not “information” or “advice” as long been the cause of legal argument amongst solicitors and barristers.

Commercial Litigation Funding

If you are thinking about taking legal action against another individual or company but are worried about the costs involved, Advantage Litigation Services have the skills and expertise to help you find a way of funding commercial litigation without risking your personal finances or those of your business. Click here to contact us today or call 0800 160 1298 to see how we can help.

Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • In a further sign of the burgeoning litigation and dispute resolution market in the UK, a London based litigation funding provider is making available funding in excess £585m to tackle high-value civil litigation claims in the UK courts. Read More

  • New research published recently by insurance broker and risk managers Gallagher suggests that incidents of legal threats, claims and formal complaints against UK companies is likely to continue to increase over the next few years. With the volume of such actions having over doubled since 2018 and having increased by an incredible 300% since 2016, it is vital that UK businesses take positive steps to mitigate against such eventualities. The Gallagher data, based on surveying more than 3,000 UK businesses across multiple sectors, found that in the past five years, over half (56%) of all businesses have faced an accusation, claim or allegation of unlawful behaviour. Sectors facing the most litigation include IT (72%) and construction (60%), and amongst these the proportion is even higher.Employees make up the bulk of the accusations (44%), followed by customers (23%), clients (22%) and suppliers... Read More

  • Following the collapse of construction giant Carillion in Jan 2018, litigation funding has recently been confirmed allowing the defunct business to pursue legal action against accountants KPMG. The funding has been agreed by Litigation Capital Management (LCM), who have agreed to fund the £250m claim being made by Carillion’s liquidator in the Commercial Court. It what is widely regarded as the largest ever corporate failure in the UK’s construction sector, Carillion collapsed in January 2018 with reported liabilities of around £7bn. Before their collapse, Carillion formed part of a consortium that held contracts to build part of the forthcoming HS2 high speed railway line, it maintained 50,000 homes for the Ministry of Defence and managed schools, highways and prisons. On 10 July 2017, Carillion announced that its profits would be hit to the tune of £845m and, as a consequence, its chief... Read More