Call us today0800 160 1298
 
 

Advantage Litigation

Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

New EU copyright law threatens user generated content

Posted by on in Uncategorized
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 580
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

A recent decision by the European Parliament approving a new copyright law could have major implications for online user generated content and may even ‘destroy the internet as we know it’ according to user groups.

The changes to the EU Copyright Directive were recently voted in by MEP’s in Strasbourg. The vote has added additional clauses to the existing legislation, namely Articles 11 and 13, dubbed by independent commentators as the ‘link tax’ and ‘upload filter’. The legislation has been updated to bring EU copyright law up to date and fit for purpose for the internet age, and as is so often the case with such changes, its impact is likely to be far greater than originally intended. The decision will now be presented to the 28 EU countries before finalising the detail in law.

The new laws will allow companies to make wide ranging and all-encompassing blocking action of user generated content such as animated GIF’s, or internet memes that use copyrighted content, typically images, videos or written content. The rules will give far more power to copyright owners of such content, from social media platforms through to news organisations and record labels. The legislation will also place the responsibility of screening such content on to the website publishers and platforms themselves, meaning that popular social media companies such as Facebook and YouTube would need to scan and check all uploaded content for potential copyright infringement – a gargantuan task.

Many mainstream media businesses have welcomed the proposed new laws, as it is likely that search engines and websites quoting such sources will be subject to a licence fee for use of the content. However, it could mean the end of popular user generated content from individual’s including music mixes, animated GIF’s and other re-purposed creative content.

The scope of these changes has galvanised response from a wide range of internet technology influencers and decision makers. 70 such individuals, including the ‘inventor of the internet’ Sir Tim Berners-Lee, have written an open letter to the President of the European

Parliament objecting to the implementation of the new rules:

"We support the consideration of measures that would improve the ability for creators to receive fair remuneration for the use of their works online…but we cannot support Article 13, which would mandate Internet platforms to embed an automated infrastructure for monitoring and censorship deep into their networks.'

The letter continues:

“(Article 13)..takes an unprecedented step towards the transformation of the Internet from an open platform for sharing and innovation, into a tool for the automated surveillance and control of its users… Article 13 effectively deputizes social media and other Internet companies as copyright police, forcing them to implement a highly invasive surveillance infrastructure across their entire service offerings…aside from the harm from the provisions of Article 13, this infrastructure can be easily repurposed by government and corporations – and further entrenches ubiquitous surveillance into the fabric of the Internet.”

If you are thinking about suing another company but are worried about the costs of resolving the dispute or going to court, Advantage Litigation Services can help. We have vast experience navigating the different ways of funding commercial dispute resolution and are best placed to help you identify the most appropriate funding option and litigation protection that will best benefit you and your business. Click here to contact us or call 0800 160 1298 to discuss how we can help you manage the risks and find a funding option that works for you.

 

Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • Before the Event Insurance – commonly shortened to “BTE”- is an insurance policy that is purchased by a business or individual that is designed to cover legal costs in the event of them needing to make a claim or should a claim be made against them. Whilst you can purchase BTE insurance as a ‘standalone’ policy, it is more commonly included with a range of business or personal insurance products. As with most types of insurance, the cover that a BTE policy provides can vary and is vital that the policy cover, and its limitations, are fully understood before buying a policy. Why should I consider BTE insurance? Legal expenses insurance such as BTE is available so that in the event you require legal advice, the legal expenses insurance will cover the cost of that advice. A solicitor or law firm should... Read More

  • In news that has pleased the stock market in London, litigation funding providers Burford Capital have recently announced that the class action claim made by its investors has been abandoned. The class action claim had originally been made via by New York based investor claims specialists Rosen Law, with the legal action alleging that Burford, one of the world’s largest litigation funders, had made false and/or misleading statements on its financial returns. Burford had strenuously denied making any such false statements and denied that their business was facing financial difficulty. Burford reported to the London Stock Exchange in early January that the US securities action filed in August last year has been withdrawn and dismissed in its entirety. Burford also confirmed that there was no further litigation pending against it at present, other than ‘ordinary course skirmishing’ within a small number... Read More

  • One of the UK’s largest class action claims has recently settled after three years of legal argument and rancour. The parties in the Bates v Post Office group litigation announced in early December that the claim has been settled, with the Post Office admitting “we got things wrong in our dealings with a number of postmasters”. A joint statement issued by both parties said that several days of ‘respectful, challenging, and ultimately successful mediation’ had successfully concluded in a ‘comprehensive resolution’ to the litigation’. The mediation was championed by Post Office CEO Nick Read, with the claim being settled for £57.75m. The statement also made clear the Post Office’s gratitude to the claimants, saying that and ‘in the past, we have fallen short and we apologise to those affected’. Commenting further on the mediated settlement, Read added: I am very pleased we... Read More