Call us today0800 160 1298
 
 

Advantage Litigation

Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

Meghan Markel’s wedding dress subject of intellectual property design dispute

Posted by on in Uncategorized
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 355
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

Following May’s hugely successful royal wedding in which US actress Meghan Markle married Prince Harry, sixth in the line of succession to the British throne, a row has broken out over the design of Markle’s dress.

The dress, widely regarded as a classic, understated design featured a 16 foot long veil with 53 flowers embroidered upon it to represent the 53 member countries of the Commonwealth, was designed by British designer Clare Waight Keller, on behalf of legendary French fashion house Givenchy. However, New Zealand designer Emilia Wickstead – who is the Duchess of Cambridge’s favourite designer - had said the stunning gown, which has been estimated to have cost anything from £200,000 to £380,000, was identical to one of her own designs that retail for around £7,000.

Wickstead’s claims, made on social media, caused outrage in the fashion community and even resulted in the London based designers Twitter account being suspended. Wickstead had said that "Apparently a lot of commentators were saying 'It's an Emilia Wickstead dress." She also criticised Markle’s dress and hair, saying "If you choose a simple design the fit should be perfect. Her wedding dress was quite loose…I was like, hold the wisps back — it's a royal wedding for God's sake"

It will be interesting to see if the furore will result in any formal action, which could include a potential claim for Intellectual Property (IP) infringement.

If you are considering legal action against a business or individual, Advantage Litigation Services have the skills and expertise to help. Click here to contact us  today or call 0800 160 1298 to see how we can help.

Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • In a decision that could prove to be the final nail in the coffin for much criticised Transport Secretary Chris Grayling, the UK Government must pay £33m to Eurotunnel following the botched award of ferry contracts should there be a ‘no-deal’ Brexit. The payment, in settlement of a lawsuit against the Government based on how certain freight contracts were awarded, is the latest in a long line of poor decisions and embarrassments for Grayling. The legal claim and subsequent compensation is as a result of the way that Department for Transport’s (DfT) contracted with three suppliers to provide extra transport and freight capacity on ferries. The contracts, awarded in December 2018, included the universally derided agreement with Seaborne Freight, a company that has never run a ferry service and didn’t have any ships. The Seaborne contract would have been worth £13.8m,... Read More

  • A Cheshire couple are taking legal action against the company behind the UK’s £56 billion HS2 railway expansion project, claiming that their home – which is set to be acquired by HS2 via a compulsory purchase order – is worth far more than HS2 have offered them. The controversial HS2 scheme was originally designed to provide a new, high speed rail connection between London, Birmingham, the East Midlands, Leeds and Manchester. It has already consumed over £5.5 billion of mainly public money, including the compulsory purchase and demolition costs for around 400 houses, and the whole scheme has recently been threatened with early termination due to the spiralling costs involved. £60,000 shortfall The couple taking legal action against HS2, Trevor and Justine Palin, originally had their 150 year old cottage valued at £485,000 in 2013 but were only offered £400,000 by HS2. The... Read More

  • Epic Games, makers of the hugely popular online computer game ‘Fortnite’ are taking legal action against the organisers of a UK ‘live experience’ event that was based on the game. Fortnite is widely regarded as the most popular computer game ever and has become a cultural phenomenon. Since its release in 2017, the game’s popularity has exploded. Victory dances that are featured in the game, including the “floss”, have been banned by some schools after they became a craze among children. With the Battle Royale version attracting more than 125 million players in less than 12 months and in the process, earning hundreds of millions of dollars in fees per month, it is estimated that the games revenues exceeded $2.4 billion in 2018. The recent ‘Fortnite Live’ event took place in near Norwich in Norfolk in the UK, with just under 3,000... Read More