Call us today0800 160 1298

Advantage Litigation

Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

London Legal Fight Over £33m Ferrari

Posted by on in Uncategorized
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 184
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

An apparently mundane car part, the gearbox, is at the centre of a legal dispute involving a very rare - and very expensive – Ferrari

The car at the centre of the dispute is a 1962 Ferrari 250 GTO. As well as being one of the most beautiful cars of the 1960’s, the classic sports car, one of 39 originally manufactured, comes complete with an in-depth motor racing pedigree.

The car was sold by US lawyer Bernard Carl for £33m back in October 2017, making it the most expensive car ever sold privately. The purchaser, UK-based exotic car dealer Gregor Fisken (UK), took legal action against Carl in London earlier this year, arguing that Carl delivered the car without the original 5-speed manual transmission, even though the car didn’t have it at the point of sale; a fact that both parties were aware of.

Fisken claims that he bought the car from Carl knowing about the missing gearbox, but arguing in court that Carl agreed to locate and deliver the missing part. Since then, Fisken has further sold on the car, and now has its new owner demanding he supply the correct gearbox.

Court papers have revealed that a third-party, based in the USA, is in possession of the gearbox. Fisken says he and Carl had an agreement for the delivery of the gearbox at a later time, but the matter was never put down on paper because they couldn’t agree on who would pay the $25,000 “release fee” to the gearbox’s current ‘keeper’. Fisken says Carl should have paid it, while Carl argues Fisken should have traveled to the U.S. to retrieve the part himself – and pay the release fee and another $500,000 to Carl for locating it. Fisken wants the court to force Carl to deliver the gearbox, while Carl argues that whatever understanding they had became null when Fisken sold off the Ferrari.

A decision in the case is expected to made by the court by early 2020.

Commercial Litigation Funding

If you are thinking about taking legal action against another individual or company but are worried about the costs involved, Advantage Litigation Services have the skills and expertise to help you find a way of funding commercial litigation without risking your personal finances or those of your business. Click here to contact us today or call 0800 160 1298 to see how we can help.

Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • As well as dominating the recent UK news agenda, it would seem that the new life that the Duke and Duchess of Suffolk are planning is already facing a potential legal battle over the ownership of their ‘Sussex Royal’ trademark. Whilst the ‘Sussex Royal’ brand and trademark has already been registered in the UK, within hours of the high-profile couple’s plans being confirmed recently, an application was filed with the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) that, if successful, would result in the applicant owning the ‘Sussex Royal’ trademark in all of the 23 EU-recognised languages. The EUIPO trademark request was in German, with English listed as its second language. The rapid filing covers a range of goods under the name of the couple’s website and Instagram feed, including luggage, toiletries, jewellery and beer. Whilst Harry and Meghan can lodge an objection... Read More

  • Before the Event Insurance – commonly shortened to “BTE”- is an insurance policy that is purchased by a business or individual that is designed to cover legal costs in the event of them needing to make a claim or should a claim be made against them. Whilst you can purchase BTE insurance as a ‘standalone’ policy, it is more commonly included with a range of business or personal insurance products. As with most types of insurance, the cover that a BTE policy provides can vary and is vital that the policy cover, and its limitations, are fully understood before buying a policy. Why should I consider BTE insurance? Legal expenses insurance such as BTE is available so that in the event you require legal advice, the legal expenses insurance will cover the cost of that advice. A solicitor or law firm should... Read More

  • In news that has pleased the stock market in London, litigation funding providers Burford Capital have recently announced that the class action claim made by its investors has been abandoned. The class action claim had originally been made via by New York based investor claims specialists Rosen Law, with the legal action alleging that Burford, one of the world’s largest litigation funders, had made false and/or misleading statements on its financial returns. Burford had strenuously denied making any such false statements and denied that their business was facing financial difficulty. Burford reported to the London Stock Exchange in early January that the US securities action filed in August last year has been withdrawn and dismissed in its entirety. Burford also confirmed that there was no further litigation pending against it at present, other than ‘ordinary course skirmishing’ within a small number... Read More