Advantage Litigation
Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.
Judge criticised for ‘bullying’ Litigant in Person
- Font size: Larger Smaller
- Hits: 1213
- Subscribe to this entry
- Bookmark
London’s Court of Appeal has ruled that a judge in a recent libel claim had ‘seriously transgressed’ the fundamental principle of neutrality and had ‘bullied’ a Litigant in Person (‘LIP’) whilst they were giving evidence at trial.
The case in question, Serafin v Malkiewicz & Ors, was a libel action involving a Polish language publication called Nowy Cza. The claimant was a LIP – meaning that he was representing himself rather than using a solicitor or barrister – and was giving evidence at the trial. The trial judge, Mr Justice Jay, was accused by the LIP of making:
..frequent gratuitous interjections during the trial, hostile to the claimant, putting the claimant under enormous pressure and making it extremely difficult for him to conduct the litigation”.
The LIP’s plea was upheld at the Court of Appeal on three grounds:
1. That the judge’s conclusion that the defendants had shown a public interest defence was “unsustainable”;
2. That the judge’s finding as to the truth of the meaning of one of the allegation was “unsustainable and not one which he was properly entitled to reach on the evidence before him;
3. The judge’s unfair judicial treatment overall
In commenting on the decision, the Appeal Court said:
(the judges actions were) all the more surprising and troubling given that the claimant was acting as a litigant in person and English was not his first language (albeit he spoke it well)”.
It added:
We are also highly troubled by the repeated demands and criticisms by the judge regarding the claimant’s disclosure, in circumstances where pre-trial disclosure had been completed by both sides at a time when both the claimant and defendants had been represented by solicitors and counsel, and no application for further disclosure had been made by the defendants..further, the judge’s demand that the claimant give disclosure of ‘all relevant documents’ went beyond what the defendants had ever required and reinforces the impression that he was favouring one side at the expense of the other.”
Commercial Litigation Funding
If you are thinking about taking legal action against another individual or company but are worried about the costs involved, Advantage Litigation Services have the skills and expertise to help you find a way of funding commercial litigation without risking your personal finances or those of your business. Click here to contact us today or call 0800 160 1298 to see how we can help.
Latest News
-
New Tests are Coming for Professional Negligence Claims
Following recent Supreme Court rulings in two professional negligence cases, the Court has outlined a “wholly new legal roadmap” for professional negligence claims made in England and Wales. As a result, the Professional Negligence Lawyers Association (PNLA) have said that existing claims will now need to be reviewed, stating that “for many there could be a substantial impact on the likely chances of success and the assessment of financial loss”.The cases in question are Khan v Meadows [2021] and Manchester Building Society v Grant Thornton UK LLP [2021]. The first case centred on whether a medical expert, who failed to diagnose that a mother carried the haemophilia gene, was liable for the costs associated with her son’s autism as well as his haemophilia, whilst the second case concerned whether accountants Grant Thornton were liable for the costs of a building society... Read More
-
Failed Business Claims Highlights Risks of Not Having Professional Representation
A recently failed business claim that was dismissed at court has once again highlighted the many pitfalls and legal complexities facing litigants in person (LIPs – that is, individuals taking legal action without professional representation from a solicitor or barrister). The claim in question - Daly & Anr v Ryan & Anr. 2021 - concerned an individual businessman who had a costly judgment entered against him simply because he had repeatedly failed to abide by the rules. Read More
-
Law Firms look to New Ways of Working as Numbers Shrink
Latest statistics from the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), who are responsible for the regulation of solicitors and law firms in England and Wales, confirm what many in the profession have been predicting for a while; that law firms are accelerating the consolidation process as they begin to embrace new ways of working. Read More