Call us today0800 160 1298
 
 

Advantage Litigation

Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

Judge criticised for ‘bullying’ Litigant in Person

Posted by on in Uncategorized
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 845
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

London’s Court of Appeal has ruled that a judge in a recent libel claim had ‘seriously transgressed’ the fundamental principle of neutrality and had ‘bullied’ a Litigant in Person (‘LIP’) whilst they were giving evidence at trial.

The case in question, Serafin v Malkiewicz & Ors, was a libel action involving a Polish language publication called Nowy Cza. The claimant was a LIP – meaning that he was representing himself rather than using a solicitor or barrister – and was giving evidence at the trial. The trial judge, Mr Justice Jay, was accused by the LIP of making:

..frequent gratuitous interjections during the trial, hostile to the claimant, putting the claimant under enormous pressure and making it extremely difficult for him to conduct the litigation”.

The LIP’s plea was upheld at the Court of Appeal on three grounds:

1. That the judge’s conclusion that the defendants had shown a public interest defence was “unsustainable”;
2. That the judge’s finding as to the truth of the meaning of one of the allegation was “unsustainable and not one which he was properly entitled to reach on the evidence before him;
3. The judge’s unfair judicial treatment overall

In commenting on the decision, the Appeal Court said:

(the judges actions were) all the more surprising and troubling given that the claimant was acting as a litigant in person and English was not his first language (albeit he spoke it well)”.

It added:

We are also highly troubled by the repeated demands and criticisms by the judge regarding the claimant’s disclosure, in circumstances where pre-trial disclosure had been completed by both sides at a time when both the claimant and defendants had been represented by solicitors and counsel, and no application for further disclosure had been made by the defendants..further, the judge’s demand that the claimant give disclosure of ‘all relevant documents’ went beyond what the defendants had ever required and reinforces the impression that he was favouring one side at the expense of the other.”

 

Commercial Litigation Funding

If you are thinking about taking legal action against another individual or company but are worried about the costs involved, Advantage Litigation Services have the skills and expertise to help you find a way of funding commercial litigation without risking your personal finances or those of your business. Click here to contact us today or call 0800 160 1298 to see how we can help.

Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • An individual who has debts that do not exceed £5,000, cannot pay these debts in full now but will be able to over time, can apply to a court for an administration order. An administration order offers protection to the individual concerned and enables them to make payments of their debts by monthly instalments. An administration order also allows for a postponement of payments (a ‘moratorium’) on the enforcement of the debts by the individual’s creditors. The main benefit of this type of order is that while the order remains in force, and the debtor maintains the agreed monthly payments, no creditor may issue proceedings for (or exercise any other remedy in respect of) any of the debts covered by the order. In order for an individual to apply for an administration order, certain conditions have to be met. These include... Read More

  • A recent claim and subsequent costs order has again highlighted the financial risks that many Litigants In Person (‘LiPs’) face when taking legal action with professional representation or appropriate legal expenses insurance. Read More

  • In a ruling that is likely to have a huge impact on manufacturers of classic car replicas, a recent decision by a court in Sweden has seen Jaguar Land Rover (JLR), owners of the Jaguar Cars brand, victorious in a copyright claim against a small Swedish business. Read More