Call us today0800 160 1298
 
 

Advantage Litigation

Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

Jaguar in copyright claim win against Swedish replica manufacturer

Posted by on in Uncategorized
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 329
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

In a ruling that is likely to have a huge impact on manufacturers of classic car replicas, a recent decision by a court in Sweden has seen Jaguar Land Rover (JLR), owners of the Jaguar Cars brand, victorious in a copyright claim against a small Swedish business.


JLR brought the copyright claim in a Stockholm court against long-time Jaguar enthusiasts Karl and Anne-Christine Magnusson. The Magnussons had designed and built a replica of the famous, 1950’s Le-Mans 24hr winning C-Type Jaguar. Their intention was for the replica to be the first of six that would be made, all customisable to the buyer’s specification and with a price-tag exceeding £200,000 per vehicle. However, the court found that their replica did infringe JLR’s copyright and ordered the couple to destroy the vehicle as well as ordering them to pay JLR’s legal costs of around £400,000.

Due to its heritage, looks, racing pedigree and scarcity, the Jaguar C-Type has proved to be a popular subject for replication over the past 40 years, with over 1,500 such replicas believed to have been constructed globally. Following the court’s ruling, many classic car enthusiasts who own such replicas – and others based on similar rare and famous vehicles – are now concerned that their own vehicles may fall foul of the law should JLR decide to take a similar approach in future. If so, and with other manufacturers potentially following suit, the impact on the burgeoning classic replica car scene could be disastrous. Following the decision, a spokesperson for JLR commented:

The Swedish court’s decision in our favour confirms that we were correct to take this case. According to the Swedish court, the external shape of the Jaguar C-type does have copyright protection, and this was infringed by a car being built by the defendants company, the first of six that they planned to build and sell for over €250,000. Jaguar Land Rover is not going after private owners of pre-existing individual replica vehicles, nor insisting upon the destruction of their vehicles. However, we will take action to prevent businesses using our Intellectual Property illegally for their own profit.”

 

Commercial Litigation Funding

If you are thinking about taking legal action against another individual or company but are worried about the costs involved, Advantage Litigation Services have the skills and expertise to help you find a way of funding commercial litigation without risking your personal finances or those of your business. Click here to contact us today or call 0800 160 1298 to see how we can help.

Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • Following recent Supreme Court rulings in two professional negligence cases, the Court has outlined a “wholly new legal roadmap” for professional negligence claims made in England and Wales. As a result, the Professional Negligence Lawyers Association (PNLA) have said that existing claims will now need to be reviewed, stating that “for many there could be a substantial impact on the likely chances of success and the assessment of financial loss”.The cases in question are Khan v Meadows [2021] and Manchester Building Society v Grant Thornton UK LLP [2021]. The first case centred on whether a medical expert, who failed to diagnose that a mother carried the haemophilia gene, was liable for the costs associated with her son’s autism as well as his haemophilia, whilst the second case concerned whether accountants Grant Thornton were liable for the costs of a building society... Read More

  • A recently failed business claim that was dismissed at court has once again highlighted the many pitfalls and legal complexities facing litigants in person (LIPs – that is, individuals taking legal action without professional representation from a solicitor or barrister). The claim in question - Daly & Anr v Ryan & Anr. 2021 - concerned an individual businessman who had a costly judgment entered against him simply because he had repeatedly failed to abide by the rules. Read More

  • Latest statistics from the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), who are responsible for the regulation of solicitors and law firms in England and Wales, confirm what many in the profession have been predicting for a while; that law firms are accelerating the consolidation process as they begin to embrace new ways of working. Read More