Call us today0800 160 1298
 
 

Advantage Litigation

Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

IVF Clinic successfully defends breach of contract compensation claim

Posted by on in Uncategorized
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 930
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

A man who sued an IVF clinic in London for breach of contract over a faked signature has lost his claim for compensation at the Court of Appeal.

Referred to in the case as ‘ARB’, the man sued the clinic IVF Hammersmith after his ex-partner, referred to as ‘R’ during the hearing, was impregnated with a frozen egg fertilised from his sperm in October 2010. The impregnation was a number of months after they had separated; ‘R’ had forged the the mans signature to enable her to continue with the IVF treatment, resulting in ARB bringing a claim for compensation to reflect the costs involved in raising the child.

ARB was successful in arguing that in failing to get his consent, the clinic was in breach of contract. However, senior judges upheld a previous ruling that he was not entitled to any financial compensation because of “public policy” that meant he could not be compensated for the cost of bringing up a healthy child.

The relationship between R and ARB had effectively ended in May 2010, resulting in R moving out of the home they were sharing. In October 2010, R presented a signed form to the clinic giving consent to proceed with the IVF treatment. A number of embryos had previously been frozen with both parties’ consent and on the basis of the document, an embryo was thawed and successfully implanted.


At the original High Court hearing in October last year, Judges heard how R had traced in pen over a pencil outline of ARB’s signature on the clinics consent form. The judge also said he was satisfied that ARB had no intention of having another child with R after they had separated. ARB argued he was entitled to financial compensation from the clinic because it had breached its contract with him by failing to obtain his “written or informed consent”. The judge concluded that the clinic was not negligent and ARB succeeded on all issues “save the issue of legal policy”, which meant he could not recover damages.

The Judge at the original ruling stated that

Although he has lost this case, my judgment must be seen as a complete personal and moral vindication for ARB. The same, of course, cannot be said for R.”

He granted permission to appeal and ARB brought a challenge against the ruling in October. His lawyers argued that the legal policy referred to by the judge in his ruling was not relevant to his case as it involved a contract.

If you are thinking about taking legal action against another individual or company but are worried about the costs involved, Advantage Litigation Services have the skills and expertise to help you find a way of funding commercial litigation without risking your personal finances or those of your business. Click here to contact us today or call 0800 160 1298 to see how we can help.

 

Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • In a further sign of the burgeoning litigation and dispute resolution market in the UK, a London based litigation funding provider is making available funding in excess £585m to tackle high-value civil litigation claims in the UK courts. Read More

  • New research published recently by insurance broker and risk managers Gallagher suggests that incidents of legal threats, claims and formal complaints against UK companies is likely to continue to increase over the next few years. With the volume of such actions having over doubled since 2018 and having increased by an incredible 300% since 2016, it is vital that UK businesses take positive steps to mitigate against such eventualities. The Gallagher data, based on surveying more than 3,000 UK businesses across multiple sectors, found that in the past five years, over half (56%) of all businesses have faced an accusation, claim or allegation of unlawful behaviour. Sectors facing the most litigation include IT (72%) and construction (60%), and amongst these the proportion is even higher.Employees make up the bulk of the accusations (44%), followed by customers (23%), clients (22%) and suppliers... Read More

  • Following the collapse of construction giant Carillion in Jan 2018, litigation funding has recently been confirmed allowing the defunct business to pursue legal action against accountants KPMG. The funding has been agreed by Litigation Capital Management (LCM), who have agreed to fund the £250m claim being made by Carillion’s liquidator in the Commercial Court. It what is widely regarded as the largest ever corporate failure in the UK’s construction sector, Carillion collapsed in January 2018 with reported liabilities of around £7bn. Before their collapse, Carillion formed part of a consortium that held contracts to build part of the forthcoming HS2 high speed railway line, it maintained 50,000 homes for the Ministry of Defence and managed schools, highways and prisons. On 10 July 2017, Carillion announced that its profits would be hit to the tune of £845m and, as a consequence, its chief... Read More