Call us today0800 160 1298
 
 

Advantage Litigation

Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

IVF Clinic successfully defends breach of contract compensation claim

Posted by on in Uncategorized
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 462
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

A man who sued an IVF clinic in London for breach of contract over a faked signature has lost his claim for compensation at the Court of Appeal.

Referred to in the case as ‘ARB’, the man sued the clinic IVF Hammersmith after his ex-partner, referred to as ‘R’ during the hearing, was impregnated with a frozen egg fertilised from his sperm in October 2010. The impregnation was a number of months after they had separated; ‘R’ had forged the the mans signature to enable her to continue with the IVF treatment, resulting in ARB bringing a claim for compensation to reflect the costs involved in raising the child.

ARB was successful in arguing that in failing to get his consent, the clinic was in breach of contract. However, senior judges upheld a previous ruling that he was not entitled to any financial compensation because of “public policy” that meant he could not be compensated for the cost of bringing up a healthy child.

The relationship between R and ARB had effectively ended in May 2010, resulting in R moving out of the home they were sharing. In October 2010, R presented a signed form to the clinic giving consent to proceed with the IVF treatment. A number of embryos had previously been frozen with both parties’ consent and on the basis of the document, an embryo was thawed and successfully implanted.


At the original High Court hearing in October last year, Judges heard how R had traced in pen over a pencil outline of ARB’s signature on the clinics consent form. The judge also said he was satisfied that ARB had no intention of having another child with R after they had separated. ARB argued he was entitled to financial compensation from the clinic because it had breached its contract with him by failing to obtain his “written or informed consent”. The judge concluded that the clinic was not negligent and ARB succeeded on all issues “save the issue of legal policy”, which meant he could not recover damages.

The Judge at the original ruling stated that

Although he has lost this case, my judgment must be seen as a complete personal and moral vindication for ARB. The same, of course, cannot be said for R.”

He granted permission to appeal and ARB brought a challenge against the ruling in October. His lawyers argued that the legal policy referred to by the judge in his ruling was not relevant to his case as it involved a contract.

If you are thinking about taking legal action against another individual or company but are worried about the costs involved, Advantage Litigation Services have the skills and expertise to help you find a way of funding commercial litigation without risking your personal finances or those of your business. Click here to contact us today or call 0800 160 1298 to see how we can help.

 

Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • Providers of professional indemnity insurance in the UK have revealed the massive increases in premiums over the past two years for Architects, Builders and Surveyors following the Grenfell Tower tragedy in June 2017. The high-rise fire at Grenfell, in which 72 people died and 70 more were injured, was the UK’s worst residential fire since the WW2. As well has having a big impact on fire safety procedures and the construction and refurbishment methods that are used for high-rise buildings, the rise in professional indemnity premiums – by more than 200% in some cases – may put future developments at risk as professionals find it hard to afford cover. Professional indemnity insurance (‘PI Insurance’) is a type of insurance designed to protect businesses in the event that a client deems work produced or professional advice provided as inadequate. PII is designed to... Read More

  • September’s annual report from litigation funding business LCM has highlighted the overall lack of choice and competition in the UK’s litigation funding market. The report from the Australian based funder also highlights that the market for claimants seeking to fund litigation as a pro-active choice, rather than through financial necessity, is “almost entirely unaddressed”. According to LCM, most competition for litigation funding in the UK has been focussed on individual, one-off claims in specific market sectors where a business or individual litigant has no option other than to finance their claims this way. Whilst the UK litigation funding market shown steady growth over the past few years, market analysis suggests that only approximately 3-7% of cases were funded by significant litigation financiers. Commenting in the report, LCM CEO Patrick Moloney said that this pattern of funding was a result of there being... Read More

  • Pink Floyd legend and multi-instrumentalist David Gilmour has become embroiled in a contract dispute with the composer of a well-known and popular jingle that can be heard at train stations throughout France. The jingle, originally composed by Frenchman Michael Boumendil, is used by French national railway company SNCF throughout its 20,000 mile network. Gilmour, who joined Pink Floyd in 1967, first heard the jingle when travelling across France in 2013. In an interview with Le Parisien in 2015, he claimed that the up-baet 2-second piece made him “..want to sing and dance”. Gilmour subsequently contacted sonic branding specialist Boumendil, asking if he could use the jingle in a separate song. Alledged breach of contract Once Boumendil realised that the request was genuine and that he wasn’t being pranked, an agreement was reached between them and SNCF in 2015 and Boumendil received a co-writing... Read More