Call us today0800 160 1298
 
 

Advantage Litigation

Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

Internet news aggregators relieved over proposed EU copyright changes

Posted by on in Uncategorized
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 123
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

In a move that will come as a relief to internet news aggregators such as Google News and the Huffington Post, the European Parliament has confirmed in principal the rules to be covered under the European Copyright Directive. The proposed reforms, which have been two years in the making, are still subject to final review but in draft form they would appear to assuage news aggregators who feared that they may face copyright legal action or other penalties for displaying short pieces of content – known as ‘snippets’ – from other, third party sources.

The most contentious part of the proposals that deal with the use and publication of news ‘snippets’ come under articles 11 and 13 of the draft legislation. The Article 11 wording now indicates that news aggregators can freely share ‘snippets’ of news articles, provided they do not ’abuse’ this right and that the snippet is ‘very short’. This contrasts with the original proposals which indicated that aggregators would need to obtain a licence to share such snippets. The original proposals suggested they have to obtain a licence first.According to the agreement, the uploading of protected works for purposes of criticism, quotation, parody or caricature has also been protected.

Kathy Berry, a lawyer at Linklaters, said the changes are likely to mean that internet news aggregators will be able to maintain their current business model and therefore Article 11 'no longer has any real teeth’. She added:

If article 11 does not require news aggregators to compensate press publishers, it is not clear what it will, or is intended to, achieve in practice”

The general feeling seems to suggest that it will be up to the courts to decide whether news platforms and aggregators have made ‘best efforts’ to avoid copyright infringement and what ‘very short extracts’ are excluded from the new press publishers’ right under article 11.

Do you to take legal action over a copyright issue?

If you are thinking about suing another company but are worried about the costs of resolving the dispute or going to court, Advantage Litigation Services can help. We have vast experience navigating the different ways of funding commercial dispute resolution and are best placed to help you identify the most appropriate funding option and litigation protection that will best benefit you and your business. Click here to contact us or call 0800 160 1298 to discuss how we can help you manage the risks and find a funding option that works for you.

Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • The recent Commercial Courts Report 2019 by Portland Communications sheds an interesting light onto the types of litigation and commercial legal actions being bought in London, and the nationalities of those bring such claims. Whilst UK citizens still form the majority of claimants (407 in 2019), the next five highest number of litigants by nationality for the period March 2018 to March 2019 were the USA (37), Kazakhstan (36), Russia (29), India (29) and Ukraine (25). The period in the report saw London’s commercial courts hearing 258 cases, with 60% of the litigants coming from outside of the UK. The report highlights the continued trend of Kazak, Russian and Ukrainian individuals opting for London as their preferred litigation location, with many cases being in connection with fraud and contract disputes. High profile litigants have included Igor Kolomoisky, a businessman who was a... Read More

  • A recent decision by the Court of Appeal in the US, overturning a previous and highly controversial decision regarding unauthorised use of images on the internet, has come as a relief to professional photographers worldwide. The claim in question involved a company promoting a film festival who used a copyrighted photograph on its website without authorisation or receiving payment from the photographer that took the picture. The original District Judge ruling in Virginia permitted such unauthorised usage of the image under the ‘fair use’ rules, causing uproar amongst professional photographers with concerns over the message that the ruling sent out;- that it is ok to ‘grab and copy’ an image without payment or permission. The photograph that was used was downloaded from photographer Russell Brammer’s Flickr site and subsequently used by Violent Hues Productions as part of a ‘Plan Your Visit’ page... Read More

  • Over the years here at Advantage Litigation Solutions, we have looked at many claims and counter claims involving patents and patent infringements. With the increasing importance of intellectual property and brand identity in our globalised business world, effective legal protection of a patent is extremely important. Patents are the best way of protecting your ideas, creativity and commercial advantage against being copied. They effectively provide a legal monopoly over an innovation, and currently last for 20 years. One key aspect of a patent is how well it has been drafted; a patent should be very specific and be constructed in a way that is hard for someone else to design around. This is particularly true for product-based businesses, as a ‘me too’ copycat provider can obtain your product, copy it and – most importantly for them - sell it, thus denying... Read More