Advantage Litigation
Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.
Hollywood veteran Woody Allen in $68m legal claim against Amazon
- Font size: Larger Smaller
- Hits: 249
- Subscribe to this entry
- Bookmark
Woody Allen, a Hollywood veteran whose career encompasses acting, directing, writing and comedy, is taking legal action against internet giant Amazon after the controversial director’s latest film, ‘A Rainy Day in New York’, was shelved following the emergence of new abuse allegations.
The film, a romantic comedy starring Selena Gomez and Jude Law, was finished in 2017 but the re-emergence of sex-abuse allegations in the wake of the #me too movement has resulted in Amazon being unwilling to authorise its release, apparently indefinitely. The most recent abuse claims by Allen’s daughter Dylan Farrow have been strongly denied by the ‘Annie Hall’ star. Official investigation into the claims has also resulted in a lack of evidence, and consequently no action has been taken against.
Alleging that Amazon Studios has broken a four-film contract originally signed in 2016, Allen is now seeking $68m in damages against the global tech company. His filing at a New York federal court states:
Amazon has tried to excuse its action by referencing a 25-year-old, baseless allegation against Mr Allen, but that allegation was already well known to Amazon (and the public) before Amazon entered into four separate deals with Mr Allen – and, in any event it does not provide a basis for Amazon to terminate the contract … There simply was no legitimate ground for Amazon to renege on its promises.”
Allen, 83, also claims that Amazon owe him $9m after financing the production of A Rainy Day in New York himself, and that Amazon had committed to a minimum 90 day release of the film. His claim also states that Amazon attempted to terminate their agreements in June 2018 with no “legal or factual basis”. Amazon Studios has so far not responded to requests to comment on the claim.
‘A Rainy Day in New York’ became mired in controversy after an article by Dylan Farrow titled “Why has the #MeToo revolution spared Woody Allen?” appeared in the LA Times in October 2017. A number of Allen collaborators publicly disassociated themselves from the director, but others including actors Javier Bardem and Jude Law defended Allen, with the Law referring to the non-release of ‘A Rainy Day in New York’ as “a terrible shame”.
Commercial Litigation Funding
If you are thinking about taking legal action against another individual or company but are worried about the costs involved, Advantage Litigation Services have the skills and expertise to help you find a way of funding commercial litigation without risking your personal finances or those of your business. Click here to contact us today or call 0800 160 1298 to see how we can help.
Latest News
-
London’s commercial courts still a favourite amongst overseas litigants
The recent Commercial Courts Report 2019 by Portland Communications sheds an interesting light onto the types of litigation and commercial legal actions being bought in London, and the nationalities of those bring such claims. Whilst UK citizens still form the majority of claimants (407 in 2019), the next five highest number of litigants by nationality for the period March 2018 to March 2019 were the USA (37), Kazakhstan (36), Russia (29), India (29) and Ukraine (25). The period in the report saw London’s commercial courts hearing 258 cases, with 60% of the litigants coming from outside of the UK. The report highlights the continued trend of Kazak, Russian and Ukrainian individuals opting for London as their preferred litigation location, with many cases being in connection with fraud and contract disputes. High profile litigants have included Igor Kolomoisky, a businessman who was a... Read More
-
Appeal Court photo copyright decision a relief for professional photographers
A recent decision by the Court of Appeal in the US, overturning a previous and highly controversial decision regarding unauthorised use of images on the internet, has come as a relief to professional photographers worldwide. The claim in question involved a company promoting a film festival who used a copyrighted photograph on its website without authorisation or receiving payment from the photographer that took the picture. The original District Judge ruling in Virginia permitted such unauthorised usage of the image under the ‘fair use’ rules, causing uproar amongst professional photographers with concerns over the message that the ruling sent out;- that it is ok to ‘grab and copy’ an image without payment or permission. The photograph that was used was downloaded from photographer Russell Brammer’s Flickr site and subsequently used by Violent Hues Productions as part of a ‘Plan Your Visit’ page... Read More
-
Why your patents need legal protection
Over the years here at Advantage Litigation Solutions, we have looked at many claims and counter claims involving patents and patent infringements. With the increasing importance of intellectual property and brand identity in our globalised business world, effective legal protection of a patent is extremely important. Patents are the best way of protecting your ideas, creativity and commercial advantage against being copied. They effectively provide a legal monopoly over an innovation, and currently last for 20 years. One key aspect of a patent is how well it has been drafted; a patent should be very specific and be constructed in a way that is hard for someone else to design around. This is particularly true for product-based businesses, as a ‘me too’ copycat provider can obtain your product, copy it and – most importantly for them - sell it, thus denying... Read More
