Call us today0800 160 1298
 
 

Advantage Litigation

Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

High Court claims frequency – Music and Football dominate

Posted by on in Advantage Litigation News
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 285
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

Recent data compiled by law firm RPC sheds an interesting light on the claims trends in the High Court. The data, covering the 12 months up till 31st march 2017, shows that the most frequent claimants using the High Court were from the Music and Professional Football sectors.

PPL, originally established in 1934 and who govern and license public music broadcasting rules in the UK, were the most frequent litigators with 107 cases bought before the Court. The Performing Rights Society (PRS) who also license various music broadcasting channels were the third most litigious, with 27 cases submitted. In second place with 39 claims bought was the Football Association, with football broadcasters Sky and BT also bringing 14 claims between them. Back in 2013 the FA bought only 5 cases, the recent increase being a clear indicator of broadcasters taking a tougher line with individuals or businesses that are infringing their intellectual property rights around the broadcast of English football.

Both music and football broadcast rights holders are targeting pubs, restaurants and nightclubs that broadcast music and football without the relevant licensing authority in place, with such claims making up 23% of the PPL’s total during this period. Rounding out the top 5 High Court claimants list were Barclays Bank in fourth, and HM Revenue & Customs in fifth.

If you have a copyright or intellectual property claim, see if the team at Advantage can help. Contact us here, or call on 0800 160 1298

Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • A long running property dispute involving a father and son has reached the High Court in London in highly acrimonious circumstances. The claim is being brought by 76 year old Neville Paul in a bid to be able to stay in the home that he initially purchased 25 years ago. Mr Paul, a retired ex print worker, transferred ownership of the property to his son eight years ago, but continued to live in the property in St Albans, Hertfordshire. However, Mr Paul’s son Bradley, 52, is now insisting that his father and his disabled partner leave the property, a decision that has gone badly for the pensioner, as his son Bradley now ‘requires the property for his own use’. Branding his son as ‘workshy’, who just cares about money and who ‘knows how to get through life without working Monday to Friday’,... Read More

  • A recent ruling by the High Court in London has resulted in a decision to award a health services contract to a private company being blocked. Lancashire County Council wanted to outsource children’s health services to private provider Virgin Care, in a contract worth £104m. However, a combined challenge to the contract from Blackpool Teaching Hospitals Trust and Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust (LCFT) succeeded in arguing that Lancashire County Council had not followed the correct procurement process. Read More

  • Kazakh businessman Ilyas Khrapunov has been ordered by the High Court in London to provide full details of how he is funding litigation against him and who is providing the funding for his legal expenses. Khrapunov is the son in law of Mukhtar Ablyazov, who is being accused of misappropriating $6bn from Kazakhstan’s JSC BTA Bank prior to its nationalisation in 2009. Solicitors for the Kazakh bank have questioned how Khrapunov is funding his legal fees, given the “striking paucity” of his personal financial situation, the fact that he and Ablyazov are subject to longstanding asset freezing orders and that the banks legal fees have already exceeded £2m. Khrapunov has claimed that it is his mother who is providing the litigation funding, even though, according to the bank, she is unlikely to be in a position to do so based on... Read More