Call us today0800 160 1298
 
 

Advantage Litigation

Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

Funding Options for Commercial and Business Litigation

Posted by on in Uncategorized
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 489
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

Funding your commercial claim, be it for professional negligence, a contract dispute, insolvency or a shareholder dispute, is often a crucial part of you being able to pursue your case. Below is a list of the main factors in funding a claim:

• Third Party Funding – this is when a third party, usually a specialist provider, funds the legal (and other) costs should the claimant lack the funds or doesn’t want to fund the legal action themselves. In return, they expect to receive a portion of the damages or compensation recovered when the claim successfully concludes.

ATE (After The Event) Insurance – a type of legal expenses insurance taken out when pursuing a claim to cover the claimant against the defendants costs should the case fail.

• Getting Third Party Funding – access to third party funding is becoming easier and it is more common now to get funding in place at an early stage in the claim, rather than waiting until there is a large amount of evidence such as specialist reports, counsels opinion, etc, already in place. Also, third party funding is not a loan – if the case fails, the funder will lose their investment. Consequently, the costs of such funding are higher than a secured loan (or even other high-risk investments). Funding costs are usually higher the longer the case runs, particularly if the case goes to trial. Depending on the stage that the case settles at, a funder will typically seek a return of between 20% and 150% of their total funding.

• Paying for ATE Insurance – similar to third party funding, ATE (After The Event) premiums are usually payable upon successful case conclusion, and the premium is usually self insured (ie: no premium will be due) should the case fail. In a winning case, the ATE premium is paid out of the recovered funds. ATE premiums are lowest in the early stages of a claim, rising should the case progress and become more complex (and hence involve more risk to the insurer), especially should the case progresses to a court trial. Premiums vary depending upon the type of case, risk factors and stage the claim settles, with premiums typically starting at around 10% of the insured costs, rising to 60% (or more) at trial.

• What’s the difference; Funding vs ATE Insurance - third party funding is used to fund ongoing costs of litigation, whilst ATE insurance is used to cover the other sides costs (the defendants costs) should the claim fail.

If you are thinking about taking legal action against another individual or company but are worried about the costs involved, Advantage Litigation Services have the skills and expertise to help you find a way of funding commercial litigation without risking your personal finances or those of your business. Click here to contact us today or call 0800 160 1298 to see how we can help.

Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • In a decision that could prove to be the final nail in the coffin for much criticised Transport Secretary Chris Grayling, the UK Government must pay £33m to Eurotunnel following the botched award of ferry contracts should there be a ‘no-deal’ Brexit. The payment, in settlement of a lawsuit against the Government based on how certain freight contracts were awarded, is the latest in a long line of poor decisions and embarrassments for Grayling. The legal claim and subsequent compensation is as a result of the way that Department for Transport’s (DfT) contracted with three suppliers to provide extra transport and freight capacity on ferries. The contracts, awarded in December 2018, included the universally derided agreement with Seaborne Freight, a company that has never run a ferry service and didn’t have any ships. The Seaborne contract would have been worth £13.8m,... Read More

  • A Cheshire couple are taking legal action against the company behind the UK’s £56 billion HS2 railway expansion project, claiming that their home – which is set to be acquired by HS2 via a compulsory purchase order – is worth far more than HS2 have offered them. The controversial HS2 scheme was originally designed to provide a new, high speed rail connection between London, Birmingham, the East Midlands, Leeds and Manchester. It has already consumed over £5.5 billion of mainly public money, including the compulsory purchase and demolition costs for around 400 houses, and the whole scheme has recently been threatened with early termination due to the spiralling costs involved. £60,000 shortfall The couple taking legal action against HS2, Trevor and Justine Palin, originally had their 150 year old cottage valued at £485,000 in 2013 but were only offered £400,000 by HS2. The... Read More

  • Epic Games, makers of the hugely popular online computer game ‘Fortnite’ are taking legal action against the organisers of a UK ‘live experience’ event that was based on the game. Fortnite is widely regarded as the most popular computer game ever and has become a cultural phenomenon. Since its release in 2017, the game’s popularity has exploded. Victory dances that are featured in the game, including the “floss”, have been banned by some schools after they became a craze among children. With the Battle Royale version attracting more than 125 million players in less than 12 months and in the process, earning hundreds of millions of dollars in fees per month, it is estimated that the games revenues exceeded $2.4 billion in 2018. The recent ‘Fortnite Live’ event took place in near Norwich in Norfolk in the UK, with just under 3,000... Read More