Call us today0800 160 1298
 
 

Advantage Litigation

Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

Funding Options for Commercial and Business Litigation

Posted by on in Uncategorized
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 414
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

Funding your commercial claim, be it for professional negligence, a contract dispute, insolvency or a shareholder dispute, is often a crucial part of you being able to pursue your case. Below is a list of the main factors in funding a claim:

• Third Party Funding – this is when a third party, usually a specialist provider, funds the legal (and other) costs should the claimant lack the funds or doesn’t want to fund the legal action themselves. In return, they expect to receive a portion of the damages or compensation recovered when the claim successfully concludes.

ATE (After The Event) Insurance – a type of legal expenses insurance taken out when pursuing a claim to cover the claimant against the defendants costs should the case fail.

• Getting Third Party Funding – access to third party funding is becoming easier and it is more common now to get funding in place at an early stage in the claim, rather than waiting until there is a large amount of evidence such as specialist reports, counsels opinion, etc, already in place. Also, third party funding is not a loan – if the case fails, the funder will lose their investment. Consequently, the costs of such funding are higher than a secured loan (or even other high-risk investments). Funding costs are usually higher the longer the case runs, particularly if the case goes to trial. Depending on the stage that the case settles at, a funder will typically seek a return of between 20% and 150% of their total funding.

• Paying for ATE Insurance – similar to third party funding, ATE (After The Event) premiums are usually payable upon successful case conclusion, and the premium is usually self insured (ie: no premium will be due) should the case fail. In a winning case, the ATE premium is paid out of the recovered funds. ATE premiums are lowest in the early stages of a claim, rising should the case progress and become more complex (and hence involve more risk to the insurer), especially should the case progresses to a court trial. Premiums vary depending upon the type of case, risk factors and stage the claim settles, with premiums typically starting at around 10% of the insured costs, rising to 60% (or more) at trial.

• What’s the difference; Funding vs ATE Insurance - third party funding is used to fund ongoing costs of litigation, whilst ATE insurance is used to cover the other sides costs (the defendants costs) should the claim fail.

If you are thinking about taking legal action against another individual or company but are worried about the costs involved, Advantage Litigation Services have the skills and expertise to help you find a way of funding commercial litigation without risking your personal finances or those of your business. Click here to contact us today or call 0800 160 1298 to see how we can help.

Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • Nikolaj Coster-Waldau, one of the stars of the hit TV series ‘Game of Thrones’, is embroiled in a contract dispute with his former agent that could end up costing him up to $2 million. The 48 year old Danish actor, who plays the role of Jamie ‘The Kingslayer’ Lannister in the HBO fantasy series, has been ordered by a court in the USA to pay his former manager Jill Littman around $2 million, made up of around $1.75 million of that in back pay, plus about $225,000 in interest. The dispute is over a contract the actor had with Littman and her agency Impression Entertainment for a significant portion of hi Hollywood career, which has seen Coster-Waldau star in films including ‘Black Hawk Down’. The Emmy Award nominated actor terminated his professional relationship with Littman in 2015, stating in an email that: I... Read More

  • In a move that will be welcomed by many businesses both in mainland Europe and the UK, the recent Brexit draft withdrawal agreement contains a clause which means that EU trademarks and designs will continue to be valid once the UK formally leaves the EU (if it actually does, of course!). The clause in the withdrawal agreement, Article 54, confirms that subject to trademarks and IP being assigned to a specific owner before the end of the transition period, then such trademarks and designs will apply both in the EU and the UK.IP experts had expressed concerns prior to the confirmation of Article 54, led by the Intellectual Property Office who were acutely aware of the amount of legal and administrative work that would be involved in transferring thousands of rights. The clause will now mean that rights holders can be... Read More

  • Professional footballer Ched Evans is set to take legal action against his former lawyers in a claim for loss of earnings following his initial conviction at a rape trial. 29-year old Evans, who has also earned 13 caps at international level for Wales, faced trial for rape in 2012 where he was ultimately convicted, spending two and a half years in prison. Evans has always protested his innocence over the rape claim bought by a nineteen year old woman following from a drunken night at a hotel in Wales in 2011. On 21st April 2016, the former Sheffield United striker, currently playing on loan for League One Fleetwood Town, had his original conviction quashed by the Court of Appeal, and a subsequent and highly controversial retrial in October 2016 found him to be not guilty. Evans now intends to sue his... Read More