Call us today0800 160 1298
 
 

Advantage Litigation

Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

Disputed £2m cladding costs at London property tribunal

Posted by on in Uncategorized
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 480
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

A property tribunal has heard how an elderly resident of a London high-rise with cladding similar to that used at Grenfell Tower has been hospitalised after he was told that he would have to pay his share of the estimated £2m cost of repairing and replacing the cladding.

Richard Low-Foon, son of the 95 year old resident told the tribunal that a ‘miracle’ was now required as his father couldn’t sell his flat in the Croydon apartment block due to the investment risk for any buyer and had no other way of funding his share of the repair bill, estimated at £31,500 for each leaseholder. His father had also recently been moved to a care home on the basis that the sale of his flat would fund his care. The apartment block – Croydon Citiscape in Croydon, South London – contains 93 flats and is one of 262 blocks in the UK that have been found to have combustible cladding similar to that involved in the Grenfell Tower tragedy in 2017.

The Freeholder of Citiscape Croydon, with links to property magnate Vincent Tchenguiz, has said that it is not liable to fund the repairs, and the management company for the block - FirstPort, a large property management company that looks after 185,000 homes in 3,700 developments - has brought the case before the tribunal to determine who is liable for these costs. Initial estimates from FirstPort put the total cost at £485,000 plus £4,000 per week for fire safety marshals; this has now been revised to £2m in total. FirstPort are seeking a tribunal decision on the ‘payability’ of the costs, having been turned down for credit by RBS. In his opening remarks, the judge emphasised that the case would not set a precedent for the many other landlord / tenant / management company agreements in similarly affected blocks as it is a ‘matter of lease interpretation’, which is specific to each block. Judgement has been reserved to a later date.

Advantage Litigation Services may be able to help if you have a property contract dispute claim. Click here to contact us today or call 0800 160 1298

Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • Danish professional football – and the sports betting that is such a part of the modern game now – was thrown into disarray recently when many Danish players, including many who had performed so well at this year’s World Cup in Russia such as Christian Eriksen and Kasper Schmeichel, refused to sign a new contract governing image and commercial rights with the Danish Football Association (DBU). As well as resulting in the DBU taking extraordinary steps in calling up lower league and ‘futsal’ players to bolster the national squad ahead of their game against Slovakia, bookmakers providing odds for the game had to drastically re-think their pricing. For the game against Slovakia, a friendly, Denmark had originally been favourites at 6/4; however, once news of the contract dispute became known and the impact this would have on the team to play... Read More

  • Despite the settlement of a claim a year ago, shareholders are still waiting to receive compensation from Royal Bank of Scotland RBS. The group action claim was bought by thousands of RBS shareholders against RBS and four of its former directors, including Fred Goodwin. The legal action, the early settlement of which meant that the disgraced Goodwin would not have to give evidence in Court, alleged that the shareholders had been misled over the banks financial position when it launched a rights issued worth £12bn in 2008. The claim was settled prior to the trial commencing in May 2017, with the shareholders being awarded 82 pence per share, payable by RBS. Delays in the shareholder verification process has resulted in some investors not yet receiving compensation, although some institutional investors have received the agreed payments. One of the main claimants listed in... Read More

  • A recent judgment in a claim for solicitor’s professional negligence has highlighted the importance of appropriate expert evidence to establish whether and how any such negligence can be attributed. The claim in question alleged negligence by well-respected law firm Leigh Day in how it represented its client (a family) at an inquest. The claim was dismissed by Mrs Justice Andrews, the salient points in the judgement appearing in paragraphs 8 & 9, where the judge says: It is not enough to show that a different solicitor may have taken a different view or a different course, let alone that the client felt that the solicitor could have done more. That is why the court will rarely hold a professional to be in breach of duty in the absence of assistance from a suitably qualified expert who can explain why in his or... Read More