Call us today0800 160 1298

Advantage Litigation

Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

Disputed £2m cladding costs at London property tribunal

Posted by on in Uncategorized
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 700
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

A property tribunal has heard how an elderly resident of a London high-rise with cladding similar to that used at Grenfell Tower has been hospitalised after he was told that he would have to pay his share of the estimated £2m cost of repairing and replacing the cladding.

Richard Low-Foon, son of the 95 year old resident told the tribunal that a ‘miracle’ was now required as his father couldn’t sell his flat in the Croydon apartment block due to the investment risk for any buyer and had no other way of funding his share of the repair bill, estimated at £31,500 for each leaseholder. His father had also recently been moved to a care home on the basis that the sale of his flat would fund his care. The apartment block – Croydon Citiscape in Croydon, South London – contains 93 flats and is one of 262 blocks in the UK that have been found to have combustible cladding similar to that involved in the Grenfell Tower tragedy in 2017.

The Freeholder of Citiscape Croydon, with links to property magnate Vincent Tchenguiz, has said that it is not liable to fund the repairs, and the management company for the block - FirstPort, a large property management company that looks after 185,000 homes in 3,700 developments - has brought the case before the tribunal to determine who is liable for these costs. Initial estimates from FirstPort put the total cost at £485,000 plus £4,000 per week for fire safety marshals; this has now been revised to £2m in total. FirstPort are seeking a tribunal decision on the ‘payability’ of the costs, having been turned down for credit by RBS. In his opening remarks, the judge emphasised that the case would not set a precedent for the many other landlord / tenant / management company agreements in similarly affected blocks as it is a ‘matter of lease interpretation’, which is specific to each block. Judgement has been reserved to a later date.

Advantage Litigation Services may be able to help if you have a property contract dispute claim. Click here to contact us today or call 0800 160 1298

Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • In a decision that could prove to be the final nail in the coffin for much criticised Transport Secretary Chris Grayling, the UK Government must pay £33m to Eurotunnel following the botched award of ferry contracts should there be a ‘no-deal’ Brexit. The payment, in settlement of a lawsuit against the Government based on how certain freight contracts were awarded, is the latest in a long line of poor decisions and embarrassments for Grayling. The legal claim and subsequent compensation is as a result of the way that Department for Transport’s (DfT) contracted with three suppliers to provide extra transport and freight capacity on ferries. The contracts, awarded in December 2018, included the universally derided agreement with Seaborne Freight, a company that has never run a ferry service and didn’t have any ships. The Seaborne contract would have been worth £13.8m,... Read More

  • A Cheshire couple are taking legal action against the company behind the UK’s £56 billion HS2 railway expansion project, claiming that their home – which is set to be acquired by HS2 via a compulsory purchase order – is worth far more than HS2 have offered them. The controversial HS2 scheme was originally designed to provide a new, high speed rail connection between London, Birmingham, the East Midlands, Leeds and Manchester. It has already consumed over £5.5 billion of mainly public money, including the compulsory purchase and demolition costs for around 400 houses, and the whole scheme has recently been threatened with early termination due to the spiralling costs involved. £60,000 shortfall The couple taking legal action against HS2, Trevor and Justine Palin, originally had their 150 year old cottage valued at £485,000 in 2013 but were only offered £400,000 by HS2. The... Read More

  • Epic Games, makers of the hugely popular online computer game ‘Fortnite’ are taking legal action against the organisers of a UK ‘live experience’ event that was based on the game. Fortnite is widely regarded as the most popular computer game ever and has become a cultural phenomenon. Since its release in 2017, the game’s popularity has exploded. Victory dances that are featured in the game, including the “floss”, have been banned by some schools after they became a craze among children. With the Battle Royale version attracting more than 125 million players in less than 12 months and in the process, earning hundreds of millions of dollars in fees per month, it is estimated that the games revenues exceeded $2.4 billion in 2018. The recent ‘Fortnite Live’ event took place in near Norwich in Norfolk in the UK, with just under 3,000... Read More