Call us today0800 160 1298
 
 

Advantage Litigation

Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

Contested Debt Recovery – Making a Court Claim

Posted by on in Uncategorized
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 275
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

If you or your business is owed money by another business or individual, you can make an application to a court to claim the money that you are owed. This is known as making a court claim, and depending on your individual circumstances, there are two main types of court that you can register a claim with – the Small Claims Court and the County or High Court.

The process involved in both types of court are broadly similar. Upon submission of your claim, if a defence is entered, the case is then likely to proceed to a hearing or trial at the defendant's local court. A judge will then decide on the outcome of the case, unless of course an agreement is reached first. Even if you have started court action, it is not too late to try to reach an agreement with the defendant through some form of alternative dispute resolution such as mediation. If you try this approach and it doesn’t work, you can then continue with your original court claim.

Small Claims Court cases

The small claims court is designed to provide a low-hassle route to recovering up to £10,000 against a firm or individual. Make sure you've got a solid case before you start though, as new court fees mean you'll now pay twice as much if you lose. The small claims court is informal, with hearings being held quickly. Claims typically involve:

• Both claimant and defendant are expected to represent themselves. You can be represented (eg: by a solicitor) if you wish, but will not be able to recover the costs for this.
• As both parties are less likely to have experience in presenting and arguing their case, Judges are likely to intervene more than in other courts.
• Evidence is not normally given under oath. After the hearing both parties will be sent a copy of the judgment.
• You may be able to claim limited costs for loss of earnings while attending court, travelling and overnight expenses, and the costs of any witnesses and experts - such as a doctor or surveyor.
• At the end of the hearing the judge tells you their decision and briefly explains the reasons behind it.

County Court and High Court cases

Claims made through the County Court or High Court are for amounts higher than £10,000. Cases will take longer to process and the costs involved will be higher. Claims typically involve:

• Procedures are much more formal and the case will normally go to trial in court.
• The claimant and defendant are not expected to represent themselves. The preparation of the case can be complex and there may be witnesses or experts with knowledge of particular aspects of the case called to give evidence.
• Costs are usually awarded, including court fees and legal costs.

Professional Debt Recovery Help 

At Advantage Litigation we work in partnership with our clients to ensure that we understand and meet their expectations. Our team of highly experienced debt recovery solicitors understand how securing funds that are owed can detract from a business’s success. We are very familiar with the law in this area and will be able to handle every aspect of the process for you. We will also discuss the various finance options available and help you find a way of funding that best reflects your needs. Click here to contact us today or call 0800 160 1298.

 

Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • Despite facing criticism from the legal profession since they were updated in the Damages-Based Agreements Regulations in 2013, forthcoming updates to Damages Based Agreements (‘DBA’) are set to make this model of funding for civil litigation claims far more attractive. DBA’s are a type of contingency fee whereby a solicitor or barrister receives a portion (usually a percentage) of their Clients damages in the event of a legal action successfully concluding. This percentage deduction varies depending on the type of claim, and in addition law firms may also claim back disbursements they have incurred in running the case. The updates to the DBA regulations were recently outlined by Sir Rupert Jackson, a former Lord Justice whose name became synonymous with the massive changes to the legal landscape that resulted from April 2013’s Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act (‘LASPO’) –... Read More

  • Reigning European Cup champions and current runaway Premier League leaders Liverpool FC have failed in their bid to register the word ‘Liverpool’ as part of their wider marketing activities. The iconic club, founded in 1892 and with a fan base of millions throughout the world, had made it clear that they only wanted to register ‘Liverpool’ in the context of football-related activity. The Anfield-based club stated that its application was driven by a desire to protect fans from traders selling unauthorised products bearing the club’s name. However, a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office (IPO) has refused their application. Even though other clubs such as Chelsea FC have registered place name trademarks for similar football-related commercial usage, the ICO said that in comparison to their Premier League rivals, the ‘geographical significance’ of Liverpool as a city was far more significant... Read More

  • Three senior managers from Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), the operators of the Fukushima power plant involved in 2011’s nuclear disaster, have been acquitted of professional negligence charges following a high-profile trial in Japan. The three men - Sakae Muto, 69; Tsunehisa Katsumata, 79; and Ichiro Takekuro, 73 - were accused of professional negligence resulting in death and injury for failing to act on information about the risks from a major tsunami. In their defence, they argued that the data available to them at the time was unreliable. Had they been convicted, the three would have faced up to five years in prison. So far, there’s has been the only criminal trial stemming from the disaster. The Fukushima disaster in March 2011 was the largest since Chernobyl in 1986, and whilst there were no deaths from direct radiation exposure in the immediate... Read More