Call us today0800 160 1298

Advantage Litigation

Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

Covid-19 Crisis: Largest Class Action Claim to Proceed Remotely

Posted by on in Uncategorized
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 1141
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

The ongoing coronavirus Covid-19 crisis continues to impact on UK civil litigation hearings with a recent High Court decision meaning that the largest ever class action claim can proceed remotely. Whilst such remote hearings may be seen as a means to an end during the current lockdown conditions, once such hearings become the ‘new normal’, the impact on how civil litigation claims are conducted is likely to be huge.

The defendants in the claim in question, Municipio De Mariana & Ors v BHP Group Plc relating to the collapse of the Fundao dam in Brazil, had originally applied to stay proceedings until autumn 2020, a change of 3 months from the original hearing date set for June. The proceedings are widely thought to be the largest class action ever brought in an English court and involve around 202,000 claimants together with 520 private businesses. Compensation and damages are being sought for a wide variety of losses, from loss of individual earnings through to the wider and log-term effects on the entire area’s communities and heritage. Brazilian law is set to determine not just liability but causation and redress for what are described as patrimonial and moral damages.

Whilst agreeing to delay the hearing by 6 weeks, Judge Eyre QC was clear that should the current lockdown restrictions still apply, then the hearing will go ahead remotely. He added:

A delay of a further period of three to four months is undesirable and is to be avoided if possible…this is particularly because as just explained there is no guarantee that an in person hearing will be possible in the autumn (nor that it will inevitably be impossible in July).”

The defendants had initially requested a 7 week extension (since reduced to 5 or 6 weeks) for serving their reply evidence, saying the effects of the Coronavirus pandemic and its subsequent impact on movement would double the time needed to prepare the documents. They added that travel restrictions between the UK and Brazil had come into force just as they were about to collect evidence, and that remote working took much longer than traditional ways. Difficulties with working remotely were particularly acute in this case because of the volume of documents to be considered and the need for interpreters. They sought a relisting to July or preferably the autumn, as this gave the greatest chance of holding an in-person hearing. The claimants accepted that a modest extension was reasonable but not at the expense of the June hearing, arguing that a remote hearing of the jurisdiction challenge was perfectly feasible.

Judge Eyre granted the requested extension of time for service of reply evidence, saying it would not be practicable for this to be prepared next month. He said the court must be conscious of the problems of remote working, especially if lawyers have caring responsibilities or varying qualities of internet connection.

Commercial Litigation Funding

If you are thinking about taking legal action against another individual or company but are worried about the costs involved, Advantage Litigation Services have the skills and expertise to help you find a way of funding commercial litigation without risking your personal finances or those of your business. Click here to contact us today or call 0800 160 1298 to see how we can help.


Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • Japanese tyre and automotive parts manufacturer Bridgestone has threatened to take legal action against a one-man-band flooring company in Herefordshire over use of the ‘Bridgestone’ company name. The multinational corporation, the world’s second largest tyre manufacturer is headquartered in Kyobashi in Japan, and has production facilities in 24 countries. In contrast, tradesman Andy Bridgewater set up ‘Bridgestone Designs’ in his garden shed having been furloughed during the Covid-19 pandemic. Mr Bridgewater says he retrained to become a resin floor installer and invested all of his savings into setting up Bridgestone Designs two months ago. As a result, and despite the different nature and size of the two businesses, the tyre manufacturer has requested that he change the name of his company or face formal legal proceedings. Mr Bridgewater said that the similarity was pure coincidence. When setting up his business, he used... Read More

  •   Unpaid debts are an unwelcome hazard of operating in the commercial world. The reality of working life is that operating in the private sphere exposes a business to the risk that their fees will not be paid, or that the terms of an agreement are not honoured. In other words, the business will become a creditor and must attempt to recover commercial debt. It is common practice that in exchange for the delivery of a particular service or product, there is payment of a fee. This happens in a variety of contexts: the delivery of goods by a private courier; or the provision of specialist services by an individual of a particular profession or trade. Regardless of the facts, when a product or service has been provided there will be requirement for payment to be given in exchange. However when payment... Read More

  • Whilst Covid-19 may have forced many parts of society to slow down and re-think our approach to all aspects of our lives, recent comments by a number of High Court judges would seem to indicate that this is certainly not happening in civil and commercial litigation. The 3 judges have expressed their disquiet over the ever increasing pervasiveness of hostile and antagonistic approaches to litigation where every point, good or bad, is taken. In the case of Navigator Equities Ltd & Ors v Deripaska from July this year, Mr Justice Andrew Baker said that, in the 30 years in which he had worked in commercial dispute resolution: There has been a significant general increase in hostility and aggressiveness in the conduct of disputes…the taking of any and every point, good or bad, and other failures to display proper independence from the litigating client... Read More