Call us today0800 160 1298
 
 

Advantage Litigation

Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

Covid-19 Crisis: Largest Class Action Claim to Proceed Remotely

Posted by on in Uncategorized
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 136
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

The ongoing coronavirus Covid-19 crisis continues to impact on UK civil litigation hearings with a recent High Court decision meaning that the largest ever class action claim can proceed remotely. Whilst such remote hearings may be seen as a means to an end during the current lockdown conditions, once such hearings become the ‘new normal’, the impact on how civil litigation claims are conducted is likely to be huge.


The defendants in the claim in question, Municipio De Mariana & Ors v BHP Group Plc relating to the collapse of the Fundao dam in Brazil, had originally applied to stay proceedings until autumn 2020, a change of 3 months from the original hearing date set for June. The proceedings are widely thought to be the largest class action ever brought in an English court and involve around 202,000 claimants together with 520 private businesses. Compensation and damages are being sought for a wide variety of losses, from loss of individual earnings through to the wider and log-term effects on the entire area’s communities and heritage. Brazilian law is set to determine not just liability but causation and redress for what are described as patrimonial and moral damages.

Whilst agreeing to delay the hearing by 6 weeks, Judge Eyre QC was clear that should the current lockdown restrictions still apply, then the hearing will go ahead remotely. He added:

A delay of a further period of three to four months is undesirable and is to be avoided if possible…this is particularly because as just explained there is no guarantee that an in person hearing will be possible in the autumn (nor that it will inevitably be impossible in July).”

The defendants had initially requested a 7 week extension (since reduced to 5 or 6 weeks) for serving their reply evidence, saying the effects of the Coronavirus pandemic and its subsequent impact on movement would double the time needed to prepare the documents. They added that travel restrictions between the UK and Brazil had come into force just as they were about to collect evidence, and that remote working took much longer than traditional ways. Difficulties with working remotely were particularly acute in this case because of the volume of documents to be considered and the need for interpreters. They sought a relisting to July or preferably the autumn, as this gave the greatest chance of holding an in-person hearing. The claimants accepted that a modest extension was reasonable but not at the expense of the June hearing, arguing that a remote hearing of the jurisdiction challenge was perfectly feasible.

Judge Eyre granted the requested extension of time for service of reply evidence, saying it would not be practicable for this to be prepared next month. He said the court must be conscious of the problems of remote working, especially if lawyers have caring responsibilities or varying qualities of internet connection.

Commercial Litigation Funding

If you are thinking about taking legal action against another individual or company but are worried about the costs involved, Advantage Litigation Services have the skills and expertise to help you find a way of funding commercial litigation without risking your personal finances or those of your business. Click here to contact us today or call 0800 160 1298 to see how we can help.

 

Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • A recent independent report by London-based litigation analytics specialists Solomonic has highlighted a fall in the number of litigation actions taking place in the UK’s commercial courts, following steady growth in the preceding five previous years. The commercial courts had fast become the court of choice for litigants from Europe and farther afield, but the dual impacts of undecided post-Brexit legislation and the more recent Coronavirus Covid-19 pandemic has seen litigants seek alternative jurisdictions. The Solomonics report indicates that between April 2019 and March 2020, 198 cases were heard in London’s commercial courts, a 9% decline compared to the previous year. Litigants from EU countries formed 13.6% of all litigants, down from 16.5% two years ago. In contrast, statistics compiled by litigation consultants Portland show that the number of litigants from Singapore and Kazakhstan has risen almost 200% since 2018/19. UK... Read More

  • Global tech giant Apple is likely to face a group-action claim over multiple problems and failures of the displays on its popular MacBook Pro range. Apple, one of the ‘big 5’ global technology companies and the first US company to be valued at over $1 trillion, is the defendant in a complaint filed in a California district court that alleges a number of breaches of state and federal consumer protection laws, in addition to fraudulent concealment. Lead claimant Mahan Taleshpour is suing Apple on behalf of American consumers who have purchased a MacBook Pro from the model years of 2016 to date. Taleshpour claims that Apple was aware of - and decided to cover up - a design defect in the connection cable between the MacBook Pro's base and display. It is alleged that this manufacturing defect results in the cable... Read More

  • The ongoing coronavirus Covid-19 crisis continues to impact on UK civil litigation hearings with a recent High Court decision meaning that the largest ever class action claim can proceed remotely. Whilst such remote hearings may be seen as a means to an end during the current lockdown conditions, once such hearings become the ‘new normal’, the impact on how civil litigation claims are conducted is likely to be huge. Read More