Call us today0800 160 1298

Advantage Litigation

Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

Covid-19: Contract Law and Force Majeure

Posted by on in Uncategorized
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 198
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

The Covid-19 coronavirus crisis has gripped the UK for the past couple of months, impacting greatly on all areas of life from frontline healthcare through to closed businesses and furloughed staff. The effect on economic activity has been, and will continue to be, seismic; but as living in the Covid-19 world starts to become ‘the new normal’, what are the an individual’s or a businesses’ legal rights when it comes to goods and services that have not been received or that have been cancelled due to the pandemic?

Firstly, if you are a provider of goods or services and are now unable to fulfil your existing contractual obligations, it is important that you review the terms and conditions of your current contracts to see if there is a ‘force majeure’ clause which may cover you from any legal liabilities resulting from non-performance. Different contracts have different definitions surrounding force majeure, and whether or not Covid-19 is included will depend on each definition; the terms ‘pandemic’ or ‘epidemic’ may be included, but it would need to be judged that CV19 does indeed fall into these categories.

Force Majeure

In the absence of a relevant force majeure clause, parties covered by the contract could argue that the contract was frustrated or terminated because the supplier could no longer perform their obligations under the contract. If this is the case, there may be a certain actions available for the party seeking to frustrate the contract to recover some or all of the sums paid before the contract was frustrated. A contract will only have been frustrated if the contract had become impossible or illegal to perform because of Covid-19, and the extent to which monies can be recovered under the contract will depend on the extent to which the supplier has already incurred expenses in performing the contract.

One example would be whether or not a force majeure clause is applicable in the contract between a private school and pupils parents. In this example, the school may be obliged to look at alternative ways to provide the pupils education - through online and e-learning, for example. Provided a school is able to offer a reasonable alternative, parents may not be entitled to any refund of fees during the period of closure. If a school closed because of Covid-19 and there was no force majeure clause in the contract, there may be an argument that non-performance of the contract means that the contract has been frustrated. However, in those circumstances, the parent or student may not be able to recover any fees paid, because the school would have already incurred most of the costs in employing the staff.

Customers should also take time to review the other standard terms and conditions in various contracts in order to establish any other contractual rights they may have against the supplier. One other avenue to explore is whether there is any regulatory body which provides additional protection for consumers or whether any insurance cover applies to the losses you have suffered.

Commercial Litigation Funding

If you are thinking about taking legal action against another individual or company but are worried about the costs involved, Advantage Litigation Services have the skills and expertise to help you find a way of funding commercial litigation without risking your personal finances or those of your business. Click here to contact us today or call 0800 160 1298 to see how we can help.

Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • A recent independent report by London-based litigation analytics specialists Solomonic has highlighted a fall in the number of litigation actions taking place in the UK’s commercial courts, following steady growth in the preceding five previous years. The commercial courts had fast become the court of choice for litigants from Europe and farther afield, but the dual impacts of undecided post-Brexit legislation and the more recent Coronavirus Covid-19 pandemic has seen litigants seek alternative jurisdictions. The Solomonics report indicates that between April 2019 and March 2020, 198 cases were heard in London’s commercial courts, a 9% decline compared to the previous year. Litigants from EU countries formed 13.6% of all litigants, down from 16.5% two years ago. In contrast, statistics compiled by litigation consultants Portland show that the number of litigants from Singapore and Kazakhstan has risen almost 200% since 2018/19. UK... Read More

  • Global tech giant Apple is likely to face a group-action claim over multiple problems and failures of the displays on its popular MacBook Pro range. Apple, one of the ‘big 5’ global technology companies and the first US company to be valued at over $1 trillion, is the defendant in a complaint filed in a California district court that alleges a number of breaches of state and federal consumer protection laws, in addition to fraudulent concealment. Lead claimant Mahan Taleshpour is suing Apple on behalf of American consumers who have purchased a MacBook Pro from the model years of 2016 to date. Taleshpour claims that Apple was aware of - and decided to cover up - a design defect in the connection cable between the MacBook Pro's base and display. It is alleged that this manufacturing defect results in the cable... Read More

  • The ongoing coronavirus Covid-19 crisis continues to impact on UK civil litigation hearings with a recent High Court decision meaning that the largest ever class action claim can proceed remotely. Whilst such remote hearings may be seen as a means to an end during the current lockdown conditions, once such hearings become the ‘new normal’, the impact on how civil litigation claims are conducted is likely to be huge. Read More