Call us today0800 160 1298
 
 

Advantage Litigation

Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

Court date set for HS2 Old Oak Common contract dispute

Posted by on in Uncategorized
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 367
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

Engineering and construction firm Bechtel now has a court date set to enable its appeal against the award of the HS2 £1bn Old Oak Common station construction partner contract.

Bechtel had originally lodged a legal challenge in February 2019 claiming that HS2 Ltd accepted an “abnormally low bid” when it awarded its contract for Old Oak Common construction partner to BBVS – a joint venture between Balfour Beatty Group, Vinci Construction and Systra.
The Bechtel claim initially prevented HS2 Ltd from signing contracts with BBVS. Bechtel dropped the challenge in August 2019, meaning contracts could be signed, and construction is currently underway at the West London site.

Despite dropping its challenge against the lifting of the suspension order, Bechtel is still pursuing legal action for damages, with a trial now set to take place next month. High Court judge Mr Justice Pepperal set the start of the three week trial for 7 October, with evidence hearings due to conclude on 22 October. Two days of oral closings will then take place in November, although a date has yet to be set.

Procurement Dispute

The claim centres on the procurement process leading to the award of the contract, with Bechtel questioning BBVS’ capacity to carry out the job. High Court papers obtained last year reveal that Bechtel believes that HS2 Ltd had “clearly reached a conclusion” that the tender submitted by BBVS “was severely under-resourced and posed a real risk to the safe and timely completion and handover of Old Oak Common Station”.

In addition, it claims that HS2 Ltd should have identified the BBVS tender as appearing to be “abnormally low” and should have excluded it from the bid race on that basis. But HS2 Ltd hit back in its own court submission, denying the allegations made by Bechtel, saying it has the power to adjust the resourcing of the winning tenderer prior to contract award. In particular it says that there is no basis for identifying BBVS’ tender as abnormally low.

HS2 Ltd’s official defence document submitted to the court denies “each and every allegation” in Bechtel’s claim. It adds that while Bechtel’s bid scored higher than BBVS in terms of quality, it “scored significantly lower on price”. HS2 Ltd’s defence adds that its initial concern about resources “was based on a misunderstanding of BBVS’ month one resource proposal”.

Commercial Litigation Funding

If you are thinking about taking legal action against another individual or company but are worried about the costs involved, Advantage Litigation Services have the skills and expertise to help you find a way of funding commercial litigation without risking your personal finances or those of your business. Click here to contact us today or call 0800 160 1298 to see how we can help.

 

Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • Japanese tyre and automotive parts manufacturer Bridgestone has threatened to take legal action against a one-man-band flooring company in Herefordshire over use of the ‘Bridgestone’ company name. The multinational corporation, the world’s second largest tyre manufacturer is headquartered in Kyobashi in Japan, and has production facilities in 24 countries. In contrast, tradesman Andy Bridgewater set up ‘Bridgestone Designs’ in his garden shed having been furloughed during the Covid-19 pandemic. Mr Bridgewater says he retrained to become a resin floor installer and invested all of his savings into setting up Bridgestone Designs two months ago. As a result, and despite the different nature and size of the two businesses, the tyre manufacturer has requested that he change the name of his company or face formal legal proceedings. Mr Bridgewater said that the similarity was pure coincidence. When setting up his business, he used... Read More

  •   Unpaid debts are an unwelcome hazard of operating in the commercial world. The reality of working life is that operating in the private sphere exposes a business to the risk that their fees will not be paid, or that the terms of an agreement are not honoured. In other words, the business will become a creditor and must attempt to recover commercial debt. It is common practice that in exchange for the delivery of a particular service or product, there is payment of a fee. This happens in a variety of contexts: the delivery of goods by a private courier; or the provision of specialist services by an individual of a particular profession or trade. Regardless of the facts, when a product or service has been provided there will be requirement for payment to be given in exchange. However when payment... Read More

  • Whilst Covid-19 may have forced many parts of society to slow down and re-think our approach to all aspects of our lives, recent comments by a number of High Court judges would seem to indicate that this is certainly not happening in civil and commercial litigation. The 3 judges have expressed their disquiet over the ever increasing pervasiveness of hostile and antagonistic approaches to litigation where every point, good or bad, is taken. In the case of Navigator Equities Ltd & Ors v Deripaska from July this year, Mr Justice Andrew Baker said that, in the 30 years in which he had worked in commercial dispute resolution: There has been a significant general increase in hostility and aggressiveness in the conduct of disputes…the taking of any and every point, good or bad, and other failures to display proper independence from the litigating client... Read More