Call us today0800 160 1298

Advantage Litigation

Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

Chaos looms if EU case law is abandoned after Brexit

Posted by on in Uncategorized
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 245
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

As the UK moves ever closer to the end of the Brexit transition period on the 31st December, responses to a recent Ministry of Justice (MOJ) consultation has highlighted the potential for legal chaos if the High Court, Appeal Court and Supreme Court abandon current EU case law.

The wording of the original European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 includes provision for continuity with EU case law already in the system, meaning that such laws would become domestic UK law. Only the Supreme Court and Court of High Court of Judiciary in Scotland were granted the power to depart from retained EU case law. Following 2019’s general election, however, the latest European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020 changed the terms of the 2018 Act to allow ministers to make regulations extending the power to more courts.

In response to the MOJ consultation regarding the proposed extended powers, the Law Society argued that the power should be confined to the Supreme Court to avoid a “radical change within the administration of UK justice” resulting in “unforeseen consequences and undesired outcomes”, adding that any extension of these powers to other courts would “result in a lack of legal certainty, through the emergence of novel judgments which are either not binding on other courts or which are inconsistent with precedent”. Expanding upon their concerns, the Law Society added:

This would be most evident in the case the High Court was able to depart from retained EU case law, given the decision of one High Court judge does not bind another but it is also possible in the case of appellate courts from different jurisdictions…It is foreseeable that inconsistencies would consequently emerge, and it would take an appeal to a higher court to provide resolution. Given that many parties often settle their disputes before appeal, it is possible the period of uncertainty could last for some considerable time…It is also possible that lower courts, by departing from case law, may throw the status of previous judgments into question, even those given by more senior courts.”

The society also said any legal uncertainties would have serious implications for the UK and its wider legal sector, as well as individual parties involved. Some decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) carried “huge legal weight”, and if courts could disapply them the UK legal system could end up with “a range of interpretations”, creating uncertainty which “could take years” to resolve.

Commercial Litigation Funding

If you are thinking about taking legal action against another individual or company but are worried about the costs involved, Advantage Litigation Services have the skills and expertise to help you find a way of funding commercial litigation without risking your personal finances or those of your business. Click here to contact us today or call 0800 160 1298 to see how we can help.

Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • Whilst Covid-19 may have forced many parts of society to slow down and re-think our approach to all aspects of our lives, recent comments by a number of High Court judges would seem to indicate that this is certainly not happening in civil and commercial litigation. The 3 judges have expressed their disquiet over the ever increasing pervasiveness of hostile and antagonistic approaches to litigation where every point, good or bad, is taken. In the case of Navigator Equities Ltd & Ors v Deripaska from July this year, Mr Justice Andrew Baker said that, in the 30 years in which he had worked in commercial dispute resolution: There has been a significant general increase in hostility and aggressiveness in the conduct of disputes…the taking of any and every point, good or bad, and other failures to display proper independence from the litigating... Read More

  • The UK’s largest ever group action litigation action, ostensibly valued at almost £5bn, has been thrown out by the High Court in London with the case having been found to be an abuse of process. The case, Municipio De Mariana & Ors v BHP Group Plc & Anor, involved tens of thousands of Brazilian claimants followed the collapse of the Fundao dam in south eastern Brazil in 2015. The collapse killed 19 people and the subsequent flood wiped out many settlements and villages in its path.High Court judge Mr Justice Turner agreed with the defendants in the case after finding that the court could not handle such a disparate and unmanageable case involving so many claimants. The case was brought by PGMBM, a trading name of Excello Law Limited, on behalf of over 202,000 individual, corporate and institutional claimants against two... Read More

  • A recent ruling by the High Court in London will mean that unsuccessful claimants in the well-publicised Municipio De Mariana & Ors v BHP Group PLC & Anor group action claim will need to make an interim payment of £8m to cover 50% of their opponents legal costs. In making the ruling, High Court judge Mr Justice Turner said that it was wrong to penalise the defendants for the work done on the case. Justice Turner had already struck out group litigation on behalf of some 202,600 Brazilians last November who were claiming compensation following the collapse of the Fundao dam in Brazil in 2015, saying the task of managing such a case would be ‘irredeemably unmanageable’ if it was allowed to proceed. Read More