Call us today0800 160 1298
 
 

Advantage Litigation

Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

Casino Wins In Supreme Court Dispute

Posted by on in Advantage Litigation News
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 105
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

Casino Wins In Supreme Court Dispute

Phil Ivey, 10 times winner of the World Series Of Poker and one of the world’s best known professional gamblers, has
recently lost his bid to recover £7.7m in winnings from a game of Punto Banco (a Casino card game based on baccarat) that
took place in 2012 at Crockfords Club in London.

Genting Casino’s, owners of Crockfords, had previously secured a majority decision in the Court of Appeal in 2016 claiming
that Ivey had used a technique called ‘edge sorting’, which they claimed is not a legitimate playing strategy. Ivey
maintained he had one fairly, and the Supreme Court action centred on whether dishonesty was a necessary element in an
offence of cheating.

Edge sorting involves a player spotting tiny differences in the patterns on the reverse side of playing cards, which over
time indicates to a player the identity of the cards. 40 year old Ivey didn’t actually handle the cards, but intimated to
the croupier that rotating certain cards was important to him for superstitious reasons. 

Court of Appeal judge Lady Justice Arden said that the Gamling Act 2005 provided that someone may cheat without dishonesty or intention to deceive: depending on the circumstances it may be enough that he simply interferes with the process of the
game”

Stephen Parkinson of Kingsley Napley, the law firm representing Crockfords, said:

This is one of the most significant decisions in criminal law in a generation. The concept of dishonesty is central to a
whole range of offences, including fraud.”


If you need legal assistance with a dispute or contentious issue, Advantage may be able to help – click here to contact us or call on 0800 160 1298

Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • As the UK moves steadily closer to March 2019’s formal exit from the European Union, it is important that businesses across all sectors and of all sizes understand the impact that Brexit may have on their intellectual property and trademarks, and to make necessary changes now to help mitigate against possible legal action and litigation in future. SME’s (Small and Medium size Entities) make up over 98% of the UK’s 5.7m private sector businesses, employing over 16m people and representing £1.9 trillion in turnover p/a. The main issues for SME’s to consider and address in the run-up to Brexit from an IP and trademark perspective include: Contracts – the issue here is the effect that Brexit will have on current IP licences and agreements. Current licence wordings in use may include “the territory of the EU” – in this case, what... Read More

  • Over the years here at Advantage Litigation Solutions, we have looked at many claims and counter claims involving patents and patent infringements. With the increasing importance of intellectual property and brand identity in our globalised business world, effective legal protection of a patent is extremely important. Read More

  • Following a significant number of objections from within the legal profession in 2017, HM Courts and Tribunal Service (HMCTS) chief executive Susan Acland-Hood has committed to re-introducing a range of pilot schemes to assess the impact of revised and more flexible court hours. This follows feedback on the original consultation in which it became clear that as desirable as it may be, the actual practicalities of extending court operating hours may mean the idea is abandoned altogether. Read More