Call us today0800 160 1298
 
 

Advantage Litigation

Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

Casino Wins In Supreme Court Dispute

Posted by on in Advantage Litigation News
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 38
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

Casino Wins In Supreme Court Dispute

Phil Ivey, 10 times winner of the World Series Of Poker and one of the world’s best known professional gamblers, has
recently lost his bid to recover £7.7m in winnings from a game of Punto Banco (a Casino card game based on baccarat) that
took place in 2012 at Crockfords Club in London.

Genting Casino’s, owners of Crockfords, had previously secured a majority decision in the Court of Appeal in 2016 claiming
that Ivey had used a technique called ‘edge sorting’, which they claimed is not a legitimate playing strategy. Ivey
maintained he had one fairly, and the Supreme Court action centred on whether dishonesty was a necessary element in an
offence of cheating.

Edge sorting involves a player spotting tiny differences in the patterns on the reverse side of playing cards, which over
time indicates to a player the identity of the cards. 40 year old Ivey didn’t actually handle the cards, but intimated to
the croupier that rotating certain cards was important to him for superstitious reasons. 

Court of Appeal judge Lady Justice Arden said that the Gamling Act 2005 provided that someone may cheat without dishonesty or intention to deceive: depending on the circumstances it may be enough that he simply interferes with the process of the
game”

Stephen Parkinson of Kingsley Napley, the law firm representing Crockfords, said:

This is one of the most significant decisions in criminal law in a generation. The concept of dishonesty is central to a
whole range of offences, including fraud.”


If you need legal assistance with a dispute or contentious issue, Advantage may be able to help – click here to contact us or call on 0800 160 1298

Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • Casino Wins In Supreme Court Dispute Phil Ivey, 10 times winner of the World Series Of Poker and one of the world’s best known professional gamblers, has recently lost his bid to recover £7.7m in winnings from a game of Punto Banco (a Casino card game based on baccarat) that took place in 2012 at Crockfords Club in London. Read More

  • The Brexit effect – looming problems with patent and intellectual property law German intellectual property lawyer Ingve Stjerna has succeeded in a court action which effectively puts the European patent regime on hold, having described the UK’s desire to remain a member of the new system – the Unified Patent Court (UPC) - as ‘astonishing’. Read More

  • Contracts, Business and Alcohol – not always a good mix Mike Ashley, Sports Direct boss and owner of Newcastle United football club, emerged victorious from a recent £15m High Court case over an alleged deal made in a pub. Investment banker Jeffrey Blue claimed that he and Ashley had agreed a verbal contract which would see Blue be entitled to a bonus based on the share price performance of retail giant Sports Direct.  Whilst Ashley admitted to making the offer, the very nature of the meeting, its setting (in a Pub) and the large amount of alcohol consumed, meant that it was quite clear that he wasn’t being serious. Read More