Call us today0800 160 1298
 
 

Advantage Litigation

Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

Casino Wins In Supreme Court Dispute

Posted by on in Advantage Litigation News
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 292
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

Casino Wins In Supreme Court Dispute

Phil Ivey, 10 times winner of the World Series Of Poker and one of the world’s best known professional gamblers, has
recently lost his bid to recover £7.7m in winnings from a game of Punto Banco (a Casino card game based on baccarat) that
took place in 2012 at Crockfords Club in London.

Genting Casino’s, owners of Crockfords, had previously secured a majority decision in the Court of Appeal in 2016 claiming
that Ivey had used a technique called ‘edge sorting’, which they claimed is not a legitimate playing strategy. Ivey
maintained he had one fairly, and the Supreme Court action centred on whether dishonesty was a necessary element in an
offence of cheating.

Edge sorting involves a player spotting tiny differences in the patterns on the reverse side of playing cards, which over
time indicates to a player the identity of the cards. 40 year old Ivey didn’t actually handle the cards, but intimated to
the croupier that rotating certain cards was important to him for superstitious reasons. 

Court of Appeal judge Lady Justice Arden said that the Gamling Act 2005 provided that someone may cheat without dishonesty or intention to deceive: depending on the circumstances it may be enough that he simply interferes with the process of the
game”

Stephen Parkinson of Kingsley Napley, the law firm representing Crockfords, said:

This is one of the most significant decisions in criminal law in a generation. The concept of dishonesty is central to a
whole range of offences, including fraud.”


If you need legal assistance with a dispute or contentious issue, Advantage may be able to help – click here to contact us or call on 0800 160 1298

Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • A long running property dispute involving a father and son has reached the High Court in London in highly acrimonious circumstances. The claim is being brought by 76 year old Neville Paul in a bid to be able to stay in the home that he initially purchased 25 years ago. Mr Paul, a retired ex print worker, transferred ownership of the property to his son eight years ago, but continued to live in the property in St Albans, Hertfordshire. However, Mr Paul’s son Bradley, 52, is now insisting that his father and his disabled partner leave the property, a decision that has gone badly for the pensioner, as his son Bradley now ‘requires the property for his own use’. Branding his son as ‘workshy’, who just cares about money and who ‘knows how to get through life without working Monday to Friday’,... Read More

  • A recent ruling by the High Court in London has resulted in a decision to award a health services contract to a private company being blocked. Lancashire County Council wanted to outsource children’s health services to private provider Virgin Care, in a contract worth £104m. However, a combined challenge to the contract from Blackpool Teaching Hospitals Trust and Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust (LCFT) succeeded in arguing that Lancashire County Council had not followed the correct procurement process. Read More

  • Kazakh businessman Ilyas Khrapunov has been ordered by the High Court in London to provide full details of how he is funding litigation against him and who is providing the funding for his legal expenses. Khrapunov is the son in law of Mukhtar Ablyazov, who is being accused of misappropriating $6bn from Kazakhstan’s JSC BTA Bank prior to its nationalisation in 2009. Solicitors for the Kazakh bank have questioned how Khrapunov is funding his legal fees, given the “striking paucity” of his personal financial situation, the fact that he and Ablyazov are subject to longstanding asset freezing orders and that the banks legal fees have already exceeded £2m. Khrapunov has claimed that it is his mother who is providing the litigation funding, even though, according to the bank, she is unlikely to be in a position to do so based on... Read More