Call us today0800 160 1298
 
 

Advantage Litigation

Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

Avoiding bankruptcy proceedings the Boris Becker way

Posted by on in Uncategorized
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 127
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

Tennis legend Boris Becker, who won the first of 3 men’s singles at Wimbledon in 1985 at the tender age of 17 and who earned $25m in a successful 22 year playing career, is taking a somewhat unconventional approach in trying to avoid bankruptcy proceedings in the UK Courts. The popular ex-player turned TV pundit was declared bankrupt in June 2017, owing bankers Arbuthnot Latham & Co an undisclosed sum of money.

Becker, 50, is claiming that an ambassadorial role for the Central African Republic (CAR) provides him with diplomatic immunity from legal proceedings for bankruptcy. The German stars lawyers, including Ben Emmerson QC who hs previously represented Julian Assange, are citing the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, meaning that unless the UK’s foreign secretary Boris Johnson and the CAR give their consent, then he is immune from being subject to any legal process in the UK. Based on this assertion, Becker's legal team recently lodged a claim in the High Court in London stating that his role as EU attaché for the CAR on sporting , humanitarian and cultural affairs – including having an office in their Brussels embassy - gives him immunity.

Upon asserting his immunity from prosecution, Becker said:

The decision to commence bankruptcy proceedings against me was both unjustified and unjust. A bunch of anonymous and unaccountable bankers and bureaucrats pushed me into a completely unnecessary declaration of bankruptcy, which has inflicted a whole heap of damage on me, both commercially and professionally, and on those close to me… I have now asserted diplomatic immunity as I am in fact bound to do, in order to bring this farce to an end, so that I can start to rebuild my life. Once this gravy train for the suits has been stopped in its tracks, my lawyers will turn to the question of compensation. I will be coming after the people who forced this process through to hold them publicly accountable for their actions.”

He went on to add:

I should add that I am immensely proud of my appointment as the sports and culture attache for the Central African Republic. Sport is incredibly important in Africa and is fast becoming a universal language, a form of social diplomacy and a leveller between people from vastly different and unequal social backgrounds around the world…My diplomatic role in the Central African Republic allows me to give something meaningful back to sports supporters in one of the poorest parts of the world. There is no reason why a role of this kind should be treated any differently to an appointment as a military or a trade attache, which everyone recognises as attracting diplomatic immunity.”

Following the immunity claim, the CAR has stated that Becker has no formal relationship with them, that the role he refers to doesn’t exist and that the CAR passport he claims to have has been traced to a batch of passports stolen in 2014.

If you need advice on bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings including how to fund a claim against a debtor, contact Advantage for an initial discussion. Click here to contact us today or call 0800 160 1298 to see how we can help.

Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • Danish professional football – and the sports betting that is such a part of the modern game now – was thrown into disarray recently when many Danish players, including many who had performed so well at this year’s World Cup in Russia such as Christian Eriksen and Kasper Schmeichel, refused to sign a new contract governing image and commercial rights with the Danish Football Association (DBU). As well as resulting in the DBU taking extraordinary steps in calling up lower league and ‘futsal’ players to bolster the national squad ahead of their game against Slovakia, bookmakers providing odds for the game had to drastically re-think their pricing. For the game against Slovakia, a friendly, Denmark had originally been favourites at 6/4; however, once news of the contract dispute became known and the impact this would have on the team to play... Read More

  • Despite the settlement of a claim a year ago, shareholders are still waiting to receive compensation from Royal Bank of Scotland RBS. The group action claim was bought by thousands of RBS shareholders against RBS and four of its former directors, including Fred Goodwin. The legal action, the early settlement of which meant that the disgraced Goodwin would not have to give evidence in Court, alleged that the shareholders had been misled over the banks financial position when it launched a rights issued worth £12bn in 2008. The claim was settled prior to the trial commencing in May 2017, with the shareholders being awarded 82 pence per share, payable by RBS. Delays in the shareholder verification process has resulted in some investors not yet receiving compensation, although some institutional investors have received the agreed payments. One of the main claimants listed in... Read More

  • A recent judgment in a claim for solicitor’s professional negligence has highlighted the importance of appropriate expert evidence to establish whether and how any such negligence can be attributed. The claim in question alleged negligence by well-respected law firm Leigh Day in how it represented its client (a family) at an inquest. The claim was dismissed by Mrs Justice Andrews, the salient points in the judgement appearing in paragraphs 8 & 9, where the judge says: It is not enough to show that a different solicitor may have taken a different view or a different course, let alone that the client felt that the solicitor could have done more. That is why the court will rarely hold a professional to be in breach of duty in the absence of assistance from a suitably qualified expert who can explain why in his or... Read More