Call us today0800 160 1298
 
 

Advantage Litigation

Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

Appeal Court photo copyright decision a relief for professional photographers

Posted by on in Uncategorized
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 975
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

A recent decision by the Court of Appeal in the US, overturning a previous and highly controversial decision regarding unauthorised use of images on the internet, has come as a relief to professional photographers worldwide.

The claim in question involved a company promoting a film festival who used a copyrighted photograph on its website without authorisation or receiving payment from the photographer that took the picture. The original District Judge ruling in Virginia permitted such unauthorised usage of the image under the ‘fair use’ rules, causing uproar amongst professional photographers with concerns over the message that the ruling sent out;- that it is ok to ‘grab and copy’ an image without payment or permission.

The photograph that was used was downloaded from photographer Russell Brammer’s Flickr site and subsequently used by Violent Hues Productions as part of a ‘Plan Your Visit’ page on the website of the Northern Virginia International Film and Music Festival. Violent Hues initially claimed it didn’t know the image was copyrighted, despite Brammer clearly labelling below his image that ‘All rights (are) reserved’ beneath it. The company also claimed the image was significantly altered by further cropping, and that the use was informational and of benefit to festival goers. The Appeal Court ruled though that the cropping was done only to make the proportions of the image match others on the same page and that it didn’t constitute a ‘new expression, meaning or message’. The court also found that had the company paid Brammer for the picture its ability to inform festival goers would not have been hindered.

The decision also made it clear that if such ‘image grabbing’ behaviour became the norm, that professional photography would likely to become ‘dampened’. The Court also added that:

If the ordinary commercial use of stock photography constituted fair use, professional photographers would have little financial incentive to produce their work”

As the internet continues to evolve commercially and ethically, the Appeal decision is particularly important as it underlines that commercial entities and businesses do not have the automatic right to lift images from the Internet to use for their own ends without gaining permission first or paying the photographer. In particular, the Court highlighted how ‘the Internet has made copying as easy as a few clicks of a button’.

Innovative Litigation Funding for Businesses

If you are thinking about suing another company but are worried about the costs of resolving the dispute or going to court, Advantage Litigation Services can help. We have vast experience navigating the different ways of funding commercial dispute resolution and are best placed to help you identify the most appropriate funding option and litigation protection that will best benefit you and your business. Click here to contact us or call 0800 160 1298 to discuss how we can help you manage the risks and find a funding option that works for you.

Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • Following recent Supreme Court rulings in two professional negligence cases, the Court has outlined a “wholly new legal roadmap” for professional negligence claims made in England and Wales. As a result, the Professional Negligence Lawyers Association (PNLA) have said that existing claims will now need to be reviewed, stating that “for many there could be a substantial impact on the likely chances of success and the assessment of financial loss”.The cases in question are Khan v Meadows [2021] and Manchester Building Society v Grant Thornton UK LLP [2021]. The first case centred on whether a medical expert, who failed to diagnose that a mother carried the haemophilia gene, was liable for the costs associated with her son’s autism as well as his haemophilia, whilst the second case concerned whether accountants Grant Thornton were liable for the costs of a building society... Read More

  • A recently failed business claim that was dismissed at court has once again highlighted the many pitfalls and legal complexities facing litigants in person (LIPs – that is, individuals taking legal action without professional representation from a solicitor or barrister). The claim in question - Daly & Anr v Ryan & Anr. 2021 - concerned an individual businessman who had a costly judgment entered against him simply because he had repeatedly failed to abide by the rules. Read More

  • Latest statistics from the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), who are responsible for the regulation of solicitors and law firms in England and Wales, confirm what many in the profession have been predicting for a while; that law firms are accelerating the consolidation process as they begin to embrace new ways of working. Read More