Call us today0800 160 1298
 
 

Advantage Litigation

Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

£5bn class action claim filed at Liverpool High Court

Posted by on in Uncategorized
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 751
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

In what is widely considered to be one of the largest claims in British legal history, a joint UU/US firm has filed a complaint at Liverpool High Court seeking £5bn in compensation for victims of an environmental catastrophe in Brazil.

The law firm filing the complaint, SGP Law, is a new entrant to the UK legal scene and is comprised of a partnership between both UK and US Lawyers. SGP is representing 240,000 claimants, all of whom are alleged victims of the Sanmarco dam collapse in 2015, in which 19 people were killed and hundreds more were permanently displaced. The claim for £5bn is against mining company BHP Billiton has been filed in a UK Court as the legal action is more likely to be able to progress more quickly than if the claim was filed in Brazil. BHP Billiton is also a UK registered company.

Tom Goodhead, partner at SPG Law, said the firm chose to commence litigation in Liverpool because as well as SPG having offices in the City, they were also keen to demonstrate that there are alternative s to London Courts when proceeding with large scale claims. Commenting further, Goodhead said:

Three years on from the tragedy, nearly a million Brazilian citizens affected by the disaster have either not been compensated at all or have received low financial settlements. The process of compensation has so far been in the hands of the defendants. This is about putting the claimants in control.”

SPG are proceeding with the litigation on a conditional, no-win no-fee basis. The Firm will take up to 30% of any compensation they are able to secure; this fee will not be applied to members of the indigenous population though, according to SPG.

If you are thinking about suing another company but are worried about the costs of resolving the dispute or going to court, Advantage Litigation Services can help. We have vast experience navigating the different ways of funding commercial dispute resolution and are best placed to help you identify the most appropriate funding option and litigation protection that will best benefit you and your business. Click here to contact us or call 0800 160 1298 to discuss how we can help you manage the risks and find a funding option that works for you.

Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • A large scale contract dispute claim has commenced involving a Hull based energy plant and one of its main contractors. The plant – Energy Works Hull – terminated the contract for MW High Tech Projects as they claim that the contractor had not met the agreed project completion date. Energy Works Hull are seeking £133m in damages to cover the cost of rectifying defects, delay damages and added costs to complete works. In response, MW High Tech Projects is disputing the claim and has subsequently filed a counterclaim for just under £47m, based on provisions they say are in the original contract that provide for payment following a termination for convenience. The two parties are now heading for the High Court with claims and counterclaims stemming from failure to deliver the project, termination of the main contract and assignment of a key... Read More

  • Engineering and construction firm Bechtel now has a court date set to enable its appeal against the award of the HS2 £1bn Old Oak Common station construction partner contract. Read More

  • Whilst Covid-19 may have forced many parts of society to slow down and re-think our approach to all aspects of our lives, recent comments by a number of High Court judges would seem to indicate that this is certainly not happening in civil and commercial litigation. The 3 judges have expressed their disquiet over the ever increasing pervasiveness of hostile and antagonistic approaches to litigation where every point, good or bad, is taken. In the case of Navigator Equities Ltd & Ors v Deripaska from July this year, Mr Justice Andrew Baker said that, in the 30 years in which he had worked in commercial dispute resolution: There has been a significant general increase in hostility and aggressiveness in the conduct of disputes…the taking of any and every point, good or bad, and other failures to display proper independence from the litigating client... Read More