Call us today0800 160 1298
 
 

Advantage Litigation

Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

£1m gambling claim against online bookmaker is dropped

Posted by on in Uncategorized
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 1196
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

Prompting speculation in the UK gambling industry that a private settlement has been reached, a long running claim for unpaid winnings from a horse racing bet has recently been discontinued.

The claimant, Belfast student Megan McCann, had for the past two years been claiming £1m in unpaid winnings against leading online bookmaker Bet365. The claim stated that on 22nd June 2016, McCann had placed a stake of just under £25,000 on 12 horses running in races at Kempton Park, Naas and Bath. The bets, forming a combined total of 960 £13 each-way ‘Lucky 15s’ – were accepted by Bet365 and most were successful, in theory returning a payout totalling £984,833.

However, Bet365 – one of the UK’s largest online gambling platforms – subsequently refused to pay the winnings, claiming that the student, who was 19 at the time, was using funds for her stakes that were provided by a third party, a contravention of their terms and conditions. Bet365 also refused to refund the £25,000 stake.

After over two years of legal action, the case was formally discontinued by McCann’s legal team shortly before it was due to return to court in Belfast, a move prompting mixed reactions from punters in the UK. Some will be happy to assume that some of the winnings have been paid, but many will be disappointed that the robustness of a major bookmakers terms and conditions were not exposed and tested in court. So far, Bet365 has refused to comment on the case.

Do you need funding for a legal action? 

If you are thinking about suing another company but are worried about the costs of resolving the dispute or going to court, Advantage Litigation Services can help. We have vast experience navigating the different ways of funding commercial dispute resolution and are best placed to help you identify the most appropriate funding option and litigation protection that will best benefit you and your business. Click here to contact us or call 0800 160 1298 to discuss how we can help you manage the risks and find a funding option that works for you.

Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • Following recent Supreme Court rulings in two professional negligence cases, the Court has outlined a “wholly new legal roadmap” for professional negligence claims made in England and Wales. As a result, the Professional Negligence Lawyers Association (PNLA) have said that existing claims will now need to be reviewed, stating that “for many there could be a substantial impact on the likely chances of success and the assessment of financial loss”.The cases in question are Khan v Meadows [2021] and Manchester Building Society v Grant Thornton UK LLP [2021]. The first case centred on whether a medical expert, who failed to diagnose that a mother carried the haemophilia gene, was liable for the costs associated with her son’s autism as well as his haemophilia, whilst the second case concerned whether accountants Grant Thornton were liable for the costs of a building society... Read More

  • A recently failed business claim that was dismissed at court has once again highlighted the many pitfalls and legal complexities facing litigants in person (LIPs – that is, individuals taking legal action without professional representation from a solicitor or barrister). The claim in question - Daly & Anr v Ryan & Anr. 2021 - concerned an individual businessman who had a costly judgment entered against him simply because he had repeatedly failed to abide by the rules. Read More

  • Latest statistics from the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), who are responsible for the regulation of solicitors and law firms in England and Wales, confirm what many in the profession have been predicting for a while; that law firms are accelerating the consolidation process as they begin to embrace new ways of working. Read More