Call us today0800 160 1298
 
 

Advantage Litigation

Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

Suing your solicitor for professional negligence

Posted by on in Uncategorized
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 233
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

Sometimes, even an established professional such as a lawyer or solicitor can make a mistake that directly affects you or your business. Mistakes, whilst thankfully not that common in the UK, can mean that a wide range of claims may fail, contracts become invalid and you or your business are left picking up the pieces with the likely financial consequences that this entails.
If you have had a problem with your solicitor and you would like to find out more about making a claim for compensation, there are 4 main factors to consider:

1. Has the solicitor or lawyer actually been negligent?

It is vital to establish whether or not your solicitor may have been negligent in handling your affairs. Solicitors have a duty of care to all of their Clients, and a breach in this duty of care may well mean that they are negligent. The basic test to determine whether there has been a breach of the duty of care is simple: has the conduct of the solicitor fallen below the standard to be expected from a reasonably competent solicitor? This question needs to be carefully considered. Just because you lost your case doesn’t mean your solicitor was wrong in his advice. Or if you didn’t get the outcome you had hoped for or the amount you were seeking, then it doesn’t necessarily follow that your solicitor was negligent.

2. Is your negligence claim actually worth pursuing?

Whilst a court may decide that legally, you have ‘won’ your claim for negligence, actually receiving financial compensation is not a foregone conclusion. Solicitors are obliged to have Professional Indemnity Insurance in place against the possibility of a negligence claim being brought against them, which is a big help, but this does not necessarily mean that they can or will pay. The value of your claim is also an important factor - If your claim is worth less than £10,000, it will fall into the Small Claims Court where, regardless of whether you win or lose, you will have to bear your own legal costs. If you choose to instruct a solicitor, the costs of doing so will invariably exceed the value of the claim itself. It is only if the claim exceeds the Small Claims Court limit that you are entitled to recover some of your legal costs if you are successful.

3. Have you suffered financial loss?

To be able to make a claim, you must have suffered a direct financial loss. If there has been an intervening event that has caused the loss or the loss would have been suffered even if the solicitor had not breached their duty of care, then the claim is likely to fail. You also must demonstrate that you have mitigated (that is, taken reasonable steps to minimise the financial impact of the negligent action) your loss where possible. The costs of attempting to mitigate the loss are recoverable from the negligent solicitor, even if the attempt at mitigation ultimately fails. But if your chosen course is considered to be unreasonable, you won’t be able to recover those costs. You therefore need to choose your course wisely.
As for what is considered reasonable, the Courts have said that if it would be too costly or complicated to bring mitigating action, then you do not have to take that course of action just to protect the solicitor from the consequences of his own carelessness. But if there is a reasonable course of action, then if you don’t take it your claim will be reduced. Determining what is reasonable or unreasonable will differ from case to case.

4. Is your claim within the proscribed time limits?

The Limitation Act 1980 makes it very clear that there are strict time limits in place for you to bring a claim in the Courts. The time limit varies depending on the type of claim, but for claims against solicitors you generally need to act within six years of the date of the negligence or the date of knowledge of the negligence. Any claim older than this means your case will be statute barred and you will not be able to recover any compensation. Date of knowledge of the negligence is a key point, as not all errors are immediately obvious. Some only come to light much later - In these situations you can rely on s14A Limitation Act. This is known colloquially as the “date of knowledge” limitation or DOK. With DOK claims, you have three years from the date you ought reasonably have been aware of the error to bring a claim.

If you are thinking about taking legal action for professional negligence but are worried about the costs involved, Advantage Litigation Services have the skills and expertise to help you find a way of funding commercial litigation without risking your personal finances or those of your business. Click here to contact us today or call 0800 160 1298 to see how we can help.

Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • Jaguar Land Rover (JLR), designers and manufacturers of Jaguar and Land Rover vehicles has recently announced that it has been successful with a legal action made in China for copyright infringement. The copyright claim was originally made by JLR in 2016 against Chinese manufacturer Jiangling Motors Corp, based on Jiangling’s design and manufacture of a vehicle that closely resembles the Range Rover Evoque. Even though the copying of designs by Chinese manufacturers is well known and widespread across many sectors including automotive, legal action is relatively rare as even with the legal resources that big brands can deploy, the prospects of success in Chinese courts is considered to be low. In addition, there can often be a perception amongst the Chinese public of their local manufacturers being ‘bullied’ by foreign brands, which can adversely affect sales. Last week the Beijing Chaoyang District Court... Read More

  • Huw Jenkins, former chairman of Championship football club Swansea City FC, is making a claim for damages based on alleged professional negligence against a firm of solicitors who had previously advised him during his divorce in 2017. Mr Jenkins was chairman of the Welsh club between January 2002 and February 2019, a period of great success for the side including promotion to the Premier League and a League Cup victory in 2013. The 56 year old’s claim for damages is against law firm John Collins & Partners LLP, who had previously advised him in 2011 that his finances were not sufficiently stable to reach to an appropriate financial settlement with his then-wife. Mr Jenkins and his former wife separated in February 2011 but the divorce was not finalised in 2017, during which time Swansea City’s promotion to the Premier League resulted... Read More

  • A recent judgement has seen a costs penalty of £80,000 imposed on the Ministry of Defence (MOD) following concerns over disclosure of information as part of a contract dispute case. The case in question, Serco v Secretary of State for Defence, saw judge Mr Justice Fraser award indemnity costs against the MOD following conduct in disclosure of information that was ‘well outside the norm’ and that the required information should have been provided on a voluntary basis by the MOD months before. The claim against the MOD was bought by Serco in June last year following the outsourcing giant’s concerns regarding how its £1.1bn bid for fire and rescue services was assessed. Serco had requested a variety of information from the MOD to provide insight as to why its bid for the 12 year contract had failed, including documentation giving reasons for... Read More