Call us today0800 160 1298
 
 

Advantage Litigation

Welcome to Advantage Litigation Services. We provide affordable access to commercial litigation.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

Patents – what are they and how to legally protect them?

Posted by on in Advantage Litigation News
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 407
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

Over the years here at Advantage Litigation Solutions, we have looked at many claims and counter claims involving patents and patent infringements. With the increasing importance of intellectual property and brand identity in our globalised business world, effective legal protection of a patent is extremely important.

Patents are the best way of protecting your ideas, creativity and commercial advantage against being copied. They effectively provide a legal monopoly over an innovation, and currently last for 20 years. One key aspect of a patent is how well it has been drafted; a patent should be very specific and be constructed in a way that is hard for someone else to design around. This is particularly true for product-based businesses, as a ‘me too’ copycat provider can obtain your product, copy it and – most importantly for them - sell it, thus denying your business its legitimate revenue.

To secure a patent, you don’t need to have a fully finished product, but you will need more than just ‘high-level’ ideas. A vital part of the patent process is secrecy, as you are very likely to be unable to patent a product or idea if your idea or invention has already been disclosed in public. This is a mistake that even the biggest businesses can make, as Apple’s Steve Jobs discovered when he unveiled a new iPhone feature that Apple though was patented, but it hadn’t been, therefore losing the ability to protect their idea.

Taking the secrecy approach even further, it is possible to protect an invention or product by NOT revealing its secrets in a public-domain patent application. The classic example of this is Coca Cola, who over 100 years has never patented their unique formula and therefore has enjoyed far more commercial benefit than had they taken a 20 year patent, which would ultimately be copied exactly worldwide.

Always get appropriate legal advice when considering a patent (or for any other intellectual property matters) and always get a patent specialist lawyer to draft your patents. If you have suffered from patent infringement, our experienced team at Advantage may be able to help – call us on 0800 160 1298 or by email here.

Get in touch

  1. Your Name(*)
    Please let us know your name.
  2. Your Email(*)
    Please let us know your email address.
  3. Company Name(*)
    Please write a subject for your message.
  4. Your Phone Number
    Invalid Input
  5. Message(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  6. Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Anti-Spam, please enter the characters shown
    Invalid Input

Latest News

  • Moves by Russian billionaire and oligarch Vitaly Orlov to keep secret a worldwide freezing order worth £266m has been recently rejected by the High Court in London. in the latest twist in a dispute over the ownership of a fisheries company being heard in London. Orlov’s attempts to keep the freezing order secret is the latest chapter in a long-running dispute over the ownership of fisheries company Norebo Group. The freezing order was obtained by former business partner Alexander Tugushev as part of the protracted legal dispute to secure his one third share of the Murmansk based business. It was argued by Orlov’s legal team that Tugushev should not able to reveal details of the global freezing order to related business partners and parties without Orlov’s consent or the permission of the court, claiming that this would effectively be self-incrimination. Alexander Tugushev,... Read More

  • Formula One, the world’s premier motorsport championship looks likely to be plunged into a legal battle soon after a prospective buyer of the Force India F1 team considers suing administrators over “serious concerns about the conduct of the bid process.” Russian company Uralkali, made a serious bid to buy the team after Force India fell into administration in this summer. The team had been owned by charismatic Indian entrepreneur Vijay Mallya, Dutch businessman Michiel Mol and Indian conglomerate Sahara. Mallya, who is currently the subject of extradition proceedings by the Indian Government to force his return to the UK from India, was worth an estimated $1.5 billion at his peak in 2010, but his fortunes have declined significantly since then. The Uralkali bid ultimately failed, with the administartors agreeing a sale of the mid-table team to a consortium led by Lawrence... Read More

  • A recent decision by the European Parliament approving a new copyright law could have major implications for online user generated content and may even ‘destroy the internet as we know it’ according to user groups. The changes to the EU Copyright Directive were recently voted in by MEP’s in Strasbourg. The vote has added additional clauses to the existing legislation, namely Articles 11 and 13, dubbed by independent commentators as the ‘link tax’ and ‘upload filter’. The legislation has been updated to bring EU copyright law up to date and fit for purpose for the internet age, and as is so often the case with such changes, its impact is likely to be far greater than originally intended. The decision will now be presented to the 28 EU countries before finalising the detail in law. The new laws will allow companies to... Read More